| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 1661/18 | 31.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 319/19 | 16.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 1661/18 | 31.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 319/19 | 16.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 381/14 | 30.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 53/17 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 148/18 | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 154/19 | 16.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KR 1934/17 WA | 03.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 60/19 | 02.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 35 KR 329/14 | 27.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 270/16 | 11.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 53 BA 42/18 | 28.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 101/20 B | 04.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 3 SF 126/20 E | 22.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1162/20 B | 03.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 26 KA 5/15 | 20.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 75/18 | 04.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 AS 2919/19 | 03.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 11. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 244/20 | 10.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 11. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 35 KR 304/18 ER | 09.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 624/18 B ER | 18.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 35 KR 304/18 ER | 09.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 624/18 B ER | 18.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 9 AS 69/17 | 25.01.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 15/18 | 23.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 48/20 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 R 707/18 | 21.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 126/19 | 31.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 103/20 B | 28.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 R 1168/18 | 21.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 104/19 | 31.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 102/20 B | 27.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 39 SO 159/15 | 11.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 317/17 | 25.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 61/19 B | 04.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 U 58/16 | 21.02.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 45/17 | 05.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 16/19 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 U 60/08 | 15.11.2011 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 225/11 | 30.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 245/18 B | 27.02.2019 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 U 2370/00 | 27.01.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 224/15 | 27.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 4/19 B | 05.03.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 2 R 511/15 | 08.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 247/18 | 27.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 13/19 B | 20.04.2020 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 65/11 | 26.03.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 76/13 | 22.11.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 10/17 R | 06.09.2018 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 7 KR 538/16 | 09.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 333/17 | 08.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 25/18 B | 27.11.2018 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 10. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 27 AS 2683/19 | 09.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 10. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 102/16 | 04.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 151/17 | 30.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 351 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 351 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 351 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 319/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-319-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-319-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 319/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-319-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-319-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 53/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-53-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-53-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 154/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-154-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-154-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 60/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-60-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-60-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126858 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 270/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-270-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-270-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 101/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-101-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-101-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1162/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1162-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1162-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 75/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-75-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:10:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:10:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-75-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AS 2919/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-as-2919-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-as-2919-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144896 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 244/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-244-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-244-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 KR 304/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-kr-304-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-kr-304-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 624/18 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-624-18-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-624-18-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 15/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-15-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-15-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 126/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-126-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-126-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 104/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-104-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-104-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 317/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-317-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-317-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 58/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-58-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-58-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 60/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-60-08 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-60-08/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 U 2370/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-u-2370-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-u-2370-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136011 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 511/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-511-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-511-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135627 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 65/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-65-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-65-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 538/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-538-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-538-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AS 2683/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-as-2683-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-as-2683-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 151/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-151-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-151-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 319/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-319-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:25:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:25:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-319-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e36e0b05713b26bcddcd4513c9d700b8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2bdee8db4b81b7cbced273df0ce2a34a:0.00870700 1758055593 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.