| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 16 RJ 358/96 | 23.02.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 110/99 | 27.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 RJ 601/99 | 13.02.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 110/01 | 24.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 14 RJ 222/00 | 22.02.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 109/01 | 12.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 13 RJ 1319/97 | 17.03.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 107/00 | 23.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 12 RJ 957/97 | 07.01.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 105/00 | 07.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 2 RJ 535/97 | 09.02.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 101/00 | 19.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 17 RJ 392/99 | 25.11.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 36/00 | 08.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 14 RJ 27/00 | 01.08.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 246/00 | 24.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 RJ 610/97 | 09.04.1998 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 104/98 | 17.07.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 RA 1092/97 | 14.07.1998 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 9/99 | 20.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 9 RA 504/97 | 06.04.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 99/99 | 06.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RA 823/96 | 12.03.1998 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 98/98 | 21.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 16 RA 36/98 | 25.04.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 98/01 | 23.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 17 RA 97/99 | 25.03.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 97/99 | 25.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 RA 423/99 | 09.01.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 97/01 | 05.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 RA 896/97 | 25.02.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 94/00 BVA | 29.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RA 304/00 | 07.05.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 91/01 | 02.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 RA 911/97 | 25.02.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 90/00 | 29.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 17 RA 17/00 | 28.11.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 8/01 | 24.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 RA 177/00 | 02.04.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 87/01 | 21.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 16 RA 296/99 | 21.02.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 85/01 | 22.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 2 RA 175/00 | 09.02.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 83/01 | 08.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 RA 549/99 | 16.03.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 83/00 | 17.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 9 RA 414/96 | 06.04.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 82/99 | 25.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 16 RA 526/98 | 07.02.2001 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 82/01 | 09.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3515 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3515 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3515 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 87850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 110/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-110-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-110-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 110/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-110-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-110-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 109/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-109-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-109-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 107/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-107-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-107-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152517 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 105/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-105-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-105-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 101/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-101-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-101-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 36/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-36-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-36-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 246/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-246-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-246-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 104/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-104-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-104-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 9/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-9-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-9-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152493 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 99/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-99-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-99-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 98/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-98-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-98-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152486 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 98/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-98-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-98-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 97/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-97-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-97-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 97/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-97-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-97-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152474 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 94/00 BVA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-94-00-bva [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-94-00-bva/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 91/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-91-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-91-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 90/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-90-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-90-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 8/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-8-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-8-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 87/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-87-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-87-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 85/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-85-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-85-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 83/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-83-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-83-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 83/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-83-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-83-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 82/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-82-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-82-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 RA 82/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ra-82-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ra-82-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 110/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-110-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:52:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:52:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-110-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2cec934e3c691c57f326361c4724b884 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ca777051d75d5eb8fca0bd841b13292d:0.51422500 1745307802 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.