| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 500/09 | 18.05.2011 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 465/16 | 09.02.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 8/17 R | 15.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 9. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 9 AS 389/15 | 15.06.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 116/17 | 23.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 6. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 300/16 | 06.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 48/17 | 27.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 12/20 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 637/19 | 30.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 151/20 | 30.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 32 AY 120/20 ER | 07.08.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 105/20 B ER | 20.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 300/16 | 06.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 48/17 | 27.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 12/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 6. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 72 KR 2210/13 | 01.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 521/15 | 03.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 40 AS 871/15 | 20.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 235/17 | 26.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 43/19 R | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 410/15 | 13.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 738/16 | 13.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 15/19 R | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 9 EG 1/17 | 06.07.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 36/18 | 26.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/19 R | 25.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 50 KR 2539/16 | 10.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 53/20 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 1832/15 | 17.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 12/19 | 22.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 469/19 | 22.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 2/20 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 SB 747/16 | 24.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 2021/19 | 24.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 49 AS 3784/18 | 30.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 5. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 24/19 | 06.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 5. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 3 U 22/18 | 21.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 107/19 | 04.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 99/20 B | 06.10.2020 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 5. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 1/18 | 09.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 BA 76/18 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 3 U 22/18 | 21.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 107/19 | 04.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 99/20 B | 06.10.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. November 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 U 120/14 | 22.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 735/15 | 27.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 67 AS 1855/18 | 15.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 195/19 | 24.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 30 AS 1379/14 ER | 17.04.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 984/14 B ER | 06.08.2014 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 4. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 28 AS 353/18 | 18.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 323/19 B | 22.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 132/14 | 20.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 57/17 | 10.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 8/20 ER | 30.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 92/20 B ER | 27.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 354 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 354 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 354 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 465/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-465-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-465-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 116/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-116-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-116-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148704 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 300/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-300-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-300-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 151/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-151-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-151-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130353 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 105/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-105-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-105-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 48/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-48-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-48-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 521/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-521-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:05:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:05:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-521-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 43/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-43-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-43-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 15/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-15-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-15-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159213 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 53/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-53-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-53-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 12/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-12-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-12-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 2/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-2-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-2-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 2021/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-2021-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-2021-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 AS 3784/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-as-3784-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-as-3784-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 AL 24/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-al-24-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-al-24-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 22/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-22-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-22-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 BA 76/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ba-76-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ba-76-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 107/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-107-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-107-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 735/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-735-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-735-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 195/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-195-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-195-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AS 1379/14 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-as-1379-14-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-as-1379-14-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 323/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-323-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-323-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161570 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 57/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-57-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-57-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161564 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 92/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-92-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-92-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 465/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-465-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-465-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 17f4006308150f04bedfa3e88c73f515 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9587ab6a95fd0431528dcaf1c4e39bee:0.84027800 1758164048 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.