| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 10 SF 33/18 EK | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 27 AS 1072/14 | 23.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 712/15 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 27 AS 2872/13 | 02.12.2013 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 709/15 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 21 AS 948/20 ER | 30.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 361/20 B ER | 27.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 26 AS 556/20 ER | 20.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 202/20 B ER | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 8 KR 4266/18 | 25.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 813/19 | 16.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 706/19 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3586/19 | 16.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 1743/16 | 27.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1407/18 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 789/20 | 02.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 2156/20 ER | 16.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1345/20 B ER u. L 12 AS 1345/20 B | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 19 KG 5/20 | 20.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 3. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 AS 413/19 | 26.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 3. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 524/16 | 17.08.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 3. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 308/16 | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 3. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 308/16 | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 3. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 24 AS 2075/17 | 20.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 818/18 | 27.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 50 S 217/20 WA | 06.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 870/20 B | 17.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. November 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 142 AS 918/20 | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 2. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 U 224/15 | 09.09.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 2. November 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 13 U 97/10 | 13.11.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 52/18 | 11.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 109/20 B | 27.07.2020 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 30. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 AS 1049/10 | 26.07.2011 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 724/11 NZB | 08.12.2011 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 30. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 285/95 | 10.04.1997 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KR 777/97 | 30.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 30. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 R 4112/15 | 21.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 749/17 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 10 SF 157/16 E | 08.03.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 62/17 E | 20.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 KR 151/17 | 26.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 437/19 | 13.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 355 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 355 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 355 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 33/18 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-33-18-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-33-18-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161560 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 712/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-712-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-712-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 709/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-709-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-709-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 361/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-361-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-361-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 202/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-202-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-202-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 813/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-813-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-813-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3586/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3586-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3586-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154567 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1407/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1407-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1407-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 789/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-789-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-789-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1345/20 B ER u. L 12 AS 1345/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1345-20-b-er-u-l-12-as-1345-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1345-20-b-er-u-l-12-as-1345-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144959 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KG 5/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-kg-5-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-kg-5-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AS 413/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-as-413-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-as-413-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 524/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-524-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-524-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131525 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KR 308/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-kr-308-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-kr-308-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KR 308/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-kr-308-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-kr-308-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 818/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-818-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-818-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 870/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-870-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-870-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 142 AS 918/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-142-as-918-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-142-as-918-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 224/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-224-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-224-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 U 97/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-u-97-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-u-97-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 1049/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-1049-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-1049-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 285/95 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-285-95 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-285-95/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 749/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-749-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-749-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 62/17 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-62-17-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-62-17-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 437/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-437-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-437-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 33/18 EK [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-33-18-ek [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-33-18-ek/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => eab96fabbbc49910eabf85bea0af725e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d7861d88224e93bc662928899e3257aa:0.96353500 1758169216 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.