| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Münster | 21.07.1998 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 4/98 U R | 30.09.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | 20.05.1996 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11.08.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 3/98 U R | 28.03.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 15.06.1994 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25.11.1994 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 3/00 R | 19.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | 11.11.1997 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 15.09.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 4/99 R | 25.05.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | 25.06.1998 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 22.07.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 8/99 R | 19.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 19.02.1997 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 7/99 U B | 01.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | 02.10.1996 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 26.06.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 5/98 R | 01.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | 21.02.1996 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 29.01.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 4/98 R | 01.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 04.11.1994 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21.11.1996 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 KN 8/97 R | 01.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | 02.10.1997 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27.10.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 56/98 R | 01.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | 21.10.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28.05.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 26/98 R | 01.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 22.07.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 2/02 R | 31.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 18.12.2000 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 6/01 R | 20.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | 21.08.2000 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 10.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 65/01 R | 17.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | 21.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 31.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 53/01 R | 20.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 05.04.2001 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 59/01 R | 29.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | 17.09.1999 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 114/00 R | 30.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| 04.03.1999 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 5/00 R | 31.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | 11.05.1999 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 16.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 13/00 R | 30.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | 27.08.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 28/00 R | 31.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 09.04.1997 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25.01.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 16/99 R | 09.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 28.07.1994 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 23/99 R | 04.08.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Rostock | 03.02.1997 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 18.05.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 41/99 R | 02.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 RA 123/98 | 28.07.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 RA 156/98 | 16.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 52/99 R | 21.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | 19.02.1998 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 15.09.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 63/99 R | 29.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3557 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3557 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3557 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 88900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82314 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 4/98 U R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-4-98-u-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-4-98-u-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 3/98 U R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-3-98-u-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-3-98-u-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 3/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-3-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:44:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:44:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-3-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 4/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-4-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:44:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:44:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-4-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 8/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-8-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:44:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:44:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-8-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 7/99 U B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-7-99-u-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:44:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:44:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-7-99-u-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 5/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-5-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:44:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:44:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-5-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 4/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-4-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:44:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:44:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-4-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 8/97 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-8-97-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:44:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:44:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-8-97-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 56/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-56-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-56-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 26/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-26-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-26-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 2/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-2-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-2-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 6/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-6-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-6-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 65/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-65-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-65-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 53/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-53-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-53-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 59/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-59-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-59-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 114/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-114-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-114-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 5/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-5-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-5-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 13/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-13-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-13-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 28/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-28-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-28-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 16/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-16-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-16-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 23/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-23-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-23-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 41/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-41-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-41-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 52/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-52-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-52-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 63/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-63-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-63-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82314 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 KN 4/98 U R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-kn-4-98-u-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-kn-4-98-u-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 025f415fd8f408524989d03427c1af37 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.