| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 5 U 1185/14 | 23.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 1680/17 | 26.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 4/18 R | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 37 U 407/17 | 23.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 380/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 56/20 B | 01.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 1 U 343/16 | 07.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 477/18 | 27.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 125/20 B | 06.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 26/19 | 23.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 EG 2/16 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 EG 2/17 | 21.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 U 2598/17 | 03.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 117/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 U 1302/18 | 14.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 4241/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 AY 11/09 | 25.01.2011 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AY 127/11 | 17.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 83 KR 6061/19 | 05.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 28. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 589/16 | 29.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 427/19 | 02.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 KA 3670/98 | 14.04.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 KA 721/00 | 16.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 50/02 R | 09.12.2004 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 28. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 589/16 | 29.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 427/19 | 02.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 R 529/16 | 14.02.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 165/17 | 19.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 1969/15 | 19.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 BA 5/20 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 134/17 | 04.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 26 KR 17/20 | 25.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 483/13 | 07.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 373/18 | 01.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 35689/10 | 29.04.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 AS 1466/14 | 02.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 17 R 2252/17 | 13.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 647/18 | 23.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 17/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 9 AL 235/14 | 18.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 55/19 | 06.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 24/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 KA 3670/98 | 14.04.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 KA 721/00 | 16.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 50/02 R | 09.12.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 12 AS 2018/11 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 653/16 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 41 SB 404/15 | 03.01.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SB 60/17 | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 290/19 | 25.09.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 27. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 26 KR 953/18 | 04.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 27. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 37 U 407/17 | 23.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 27. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 356 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 356 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 356 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87503 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 4/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-4-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-4-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 380/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-380-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-380-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 477/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-477-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-477-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 U 26/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-u-26-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-u-26-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 2/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-2-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-2-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 117/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-117-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-117-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 4241/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-4241-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-4241-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AY 11/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ay-11-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ay-11-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KR 6061/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-kr-6061-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-kr-6061-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 589/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-589-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-589-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KA 3670/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-ka-3670-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-ka-3670-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 427/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-427-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-427-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 165/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-165-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-165-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 BA 5/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-ba-5-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-ba-5-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 26 KR 17/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-26-kr-17-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-26-kr-17-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 373/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-373-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-373-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 AS 1466/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-as-1466-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-as-1466-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 647/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-647-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-647-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126492 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 55/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-55-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-55-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 721/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-721-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:06:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:06:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-721-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 653/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-653-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-653-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SB 60/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-sb-60-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-sb-60-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 290/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-290-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-290-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 KR 953/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-kr-953-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-kr-953-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 U 407/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-u-407-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-u-407-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87503 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 4/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-4-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-4-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 71d41ed06beb82fc8fc50be4d0b8e755 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:390237bb882df110b1f80674e9753d66:0.69130500 1758169216 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.