| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | 09.06.1999 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 8/02 R | 28.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 RJ 954/96 A | 28.05.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 RJ 373/99 | 19.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 10/01 R | 30.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 11 RJ 537/96 | 14.04.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 RJ 257/99 | 19.07.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 46/00 R | 16.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 14.03.1997 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 25.02.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 28/99 R | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | 19.03.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14.09.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 42/99 R | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | 13.01.1999 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 29.09.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 34/99 R | 21.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 24.11.1993 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17.04.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 18/99 R | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 02.11.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 6/03 R | 14.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | 15.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 12.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 10/02 R | 10.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 18.12.2001 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 21/02 R | 31.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 02.03.2000 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 25.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 47/02 R | 30.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | 15.11.2001 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 5/02 R | 10.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 11.11.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 08.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 9/02 R | 30.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 05.12.2001 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 13/02 R | 06.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 15.01.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 51/99 | 07.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 28/02 R | 31.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 29.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 3/02 R | 09.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 31.05.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 15/02 R | 06.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | 29.05.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 19/02 R | 29.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 21.11.1996 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 22/02 R | 29.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 51/02 R | 31.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | 28.09.1992 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 10.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 3/01 R | 31.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 17.12.1997 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 11/01 R | 31.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| 29.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 22/01 R | 30.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | 20.10.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 37/01 R | 20.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | 19.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13.07.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 44/01 R | 20.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3561 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3561 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3561 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 8/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-8-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-8-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 10/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-10-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-10-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 46/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-46-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-46-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81420 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 28/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-28-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-28-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 42/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-42-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-42-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 34/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-34-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-34-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 18/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-18-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-18-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 6/03 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-6-03-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-6-03-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 10/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-10-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-10-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 21/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-21-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-21-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81409 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 47/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-47-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-47-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 5/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-5-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-5-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81405 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 9/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-9-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-9-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81404 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 13/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-13-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-13-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 28/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-28-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-28-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81395 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 3/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-3-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-3-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 15/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-15-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-15-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 19/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-19-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-19-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 22/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-22-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-22-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 51/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-51-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-51-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 3/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-3-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-3-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 11/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-11-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-11-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 22/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-22-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-22-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81383 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 37/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-37-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-37-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 44/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-44-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-44-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 8/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-8-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-8-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fbca6af6e758c871ccfb24651108adda [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.