| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 8 U 16/97 | 06.05.1997 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 245/97 | 06.08.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 5/99 R | 18.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | 27.11.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21.01.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 15/99 R | 22.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 17.08.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16.02.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 19/99 R | 18.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 U 63/95 | 13.03.1997 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 157/97 | 23.02.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 22/99 R | 17.05.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 29.11.1995 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20.07.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 33/99 R | 22.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 U 23/96 | 10.01.1996 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 435/98 | 27.05.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 40/99 R | 07.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | 27.11.1997 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22.10.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 4/99 R | 24.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 17.05.1995 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10.12.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 10/99 R | 14.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 02.09.1997 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16.12.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 14/99 R | 27.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | 29.10.1996 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15.12.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 18/99 R | 22.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | 12.02.1997 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 09.02.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 21/99 R | 27.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Trier | 08.10.1998 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 05.05.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 25/99 R | 27.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 14.12.1993 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 29/99 R | 27.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | 15.08.1996 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 16.03.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 32/99 R | 24.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | 05.12.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29.04.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 43/99 R | 22.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 23.02.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28.10.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 3/99 R | 14.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| 15.11.1994 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27.10.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 7/99 R | 18.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | 02.11.1998 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 13/99 R | 18.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | 01.07.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 03.02.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 20/99 R | 24.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | 27.07.1998 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 10.02.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 24/99 R | 22.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 27.01.1999 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 13.07.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 28/99 R | 07.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | 13.08.1996 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 19.05.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 31/99 R | 07.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 09.02.1999 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 20.07.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 35/99 R | 07.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 02.11.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 39/99 R | 07.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 22.07.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 42/99 R | 07.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3566 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3566 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3566 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 5/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-5-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-5-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 15/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-15-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-15-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 19/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-19-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-19-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 22/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-22-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-22-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 33/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-33-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-33-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 40/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-40-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-40-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 4/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-4-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-4-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 10/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-10-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-10-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 14/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-14-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-14-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 18/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-18-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-18-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 21/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-21-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-21-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 25/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-25-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-25-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 29/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-29-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-29-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 32/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-32-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-32-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 43/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-43-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-43-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 7/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-7-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-7-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 13/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-13-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-13-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 20/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-20-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-20-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 24/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-24-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-24-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 28/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-28-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-28-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 31/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-31-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-31-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 35/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-35-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-35-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82276 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 39/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-39-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-39-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 42/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-42-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:46:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:46:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-42-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 5/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-5-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-5-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4da1183d3da989b46b500395295298ce [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.