| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 38 SF 28/20 E | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 27. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 R 599/18 ZV | 10.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 778/19 ZV | 08.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 1250/18 ZV | 08.04.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 272/20 ZV | 08.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 798/18 ZV | 30.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 140/20 ZV | 08.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 39 R 23/19 ZV | 17.02.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 132/20 ZV | 08.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 28 AL 450/17 | 04.06.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 98/18 | 20.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 U 376/13 | 28.03.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 98/15 | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 R 590/17 | 26.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3071/18 | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 AS 2893/20 | 01.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1329/20 B | 05.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 SO 90/18 ER | 04.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 406/18 B ER und L 20 SO 407/18 B | 26.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 KR 1684/19 | 01.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 655/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 736/18 | 05.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 405/19 | 27.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 14 KA 391/98 | 08.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 26. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AY 39/20 | 14.10.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 26. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 5020/17 | 14.08.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 311/18 | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 14 KR 1/18 | 02.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 41/19 | 27.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 32/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 9 U 339/11 | 11.12.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 29/15 | 23.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 13/18 R | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 181 SO 1298/16 | 07.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 54/18 | 07.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 1/19 R | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 616/14 | 18.03.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 20/15 | 19.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 6/19 R | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 15 U 138/16 | 26.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 197/17 | 07.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 20/18 R | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 SF 4257/18 E | 24.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 466/20 E-B | 04.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 R 2151/12 | 30.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2853/16 | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 U 4268/16 | 26.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2649/19 | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 3171/14 | 18.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1635/17 | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 17 R 236/15 | 23.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 6/18 | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 357 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 357 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 357 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 SF 28/20 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-sf-28-20-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-sf-28-20-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 778/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-778-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-778-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160460 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 272/20 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-272-20-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-272-20-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160457 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 140/20 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-140-20-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-140-20-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 132/20 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-132-20-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-132-20-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 98/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-98-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-98-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 98/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-98-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-98-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3071/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3071-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:13:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:13:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3071-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1329/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1329-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1329-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 SO 406/18 B ER und L 20 SO 407/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-so-406-18-b-er-und-l-20-so-407-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:12:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:12:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-so-406-18-b-er-und-l-20-so-407-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 1684/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-1684-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-1684-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 736/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-736-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-736-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 391/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-391-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-391-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AY 39/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ay-39-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ay-39-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130343 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 311/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-311-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-311-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 41/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-41-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-41-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 13/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-13-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-13-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 20/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-20-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:00:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:00:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-20-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 466/20 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-466-20-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-466-20-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2853/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2853-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2853-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2649/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2649-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2649-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154543 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1635/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1635-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:14:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:14:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1635-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145859 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 6/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-6-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-6-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 SF 28/20 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-sf-28-20-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-sf-28-20-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4840afa0dab8d9b896f30459ad709d0f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4e6dbbcea707a46cd21b8462fadc9c80:0.65629500 1758175226 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.