| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 02.11.1999 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 24.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 8/02 R | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | 12.11.1997 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 01.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 10/02 R | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 21.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 04.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 14/02 R | 10.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Rostock | 22.10.1999 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 14.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 25/02 R | 18.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 13.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 21/01 R | 04.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 29/01 R | 13.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | 21.10.1998 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 06.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 13/01 R | 05.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 U 124/97 | 17.11.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 105/99 | 22.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 20/01 R | 04.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 16.02.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 24.01.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 24/01 R | 04.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | 28.10.1999 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 22.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 28/01 R | 04.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Trier | 21.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 04.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 31/01 R | 13.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 25.10.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 6/01 R | 04.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 08.12.1998 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 12/01 R | 04.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 10.11.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 16/01 R | 04.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 31.07.1997 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 07.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 27/01 R | 05.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 U 207/00 | 29.11.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 U 42/01 | 17.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 30/01 R | 13.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | 01.09.1999 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 5/01 R | 11.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 28.04.1998 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 9/01 R | 05.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13.10.1999 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 15.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/01 R | 04.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | 04.04.2000 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 06.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 15/01 R | 05.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 12.05.1999 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 33/01 R | 13.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 22.03.1999 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 16.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 4/01 R | 05.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | 29.10.1999 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 8/01 R | 05.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 03.06.1997 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/00 R | 20.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Trier | 16.04.1997 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 25.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 19/00 R | 02.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3570 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3570 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3570 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 8/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-8-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-8-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 10/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-10-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-10-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 14/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-14-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-14-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 25/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-25-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-25-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 21/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-21-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-21-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 29/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-29-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-29-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 13/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-13-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-13-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 20/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-20-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-20-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 24/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-24-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-24-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 28/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-28-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-28-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81595 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 31/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-31-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-31-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 6/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-6-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-6-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81593 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 12/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-12-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-12-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 16/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-16-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-16-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 27/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-27-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-27-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81590 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 30/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-30-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-30-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 5/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-5-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-5-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 9/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-9-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-9-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 11/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-11-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-11-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 15/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-15-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-15-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81585 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 33/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-33-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-33-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 4/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-4-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-4-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 8/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-8-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-8-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 11/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-11-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-11-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 19/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-19-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-19-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 8/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-8-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:26:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:26:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-8-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => de220e7f16c6976aaa678d5867dbdbeb [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.