Erste InstanzAktenzeichen (1. Instanz)Datum (1. Instanz)Zweite InstanzAktenzeichen (2. Instanz)Datum (2. Instanz)Dritte InstanzAktenzeichen (3. Instanz)Datum (3. Instanz)GerichtErstellt
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf30.07.1998Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen09.08.1999BundessozialgerichtB 13 RJ 67/99 R13.12.2001Bundessozialgericht25. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 51 Ar 392/9524.07.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 76/9821.01.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg24. August 2003
Sozialgericht Gießen04.11.1999Hessisches Landessozialgericht10.04.2001BundessozialgerichtB 9 VG 4/01 R24.07.2002Bundessozialgericht23. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 7 SB 388/0110.12.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 5 AL 172/0217.04.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 44 KR 251/9920.06.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 39 P 64/0105.07.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 36 U 267/0219.02.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 KA 88/0027.08.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 KA 229/0026.03.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 KA 19/0126.03.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 KA 193/0107.03.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 KA 15/0207.03.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 (10) KA 77/0015.01.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 23 U 112/0127.01.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 20 VG 266/0229.01.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 1 (16,39) RA 266/9917.12.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 13 KR 141/0209.04.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 12 P 155/0122.01.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund22. August 2003
Sozialgericht LeipzigS 13 RA 258/9930.01.2001Sächsisches LandessozialgerichtL 4 RA 93/0114.08.2002BundessozialgerichtB 4 RA 55/02 R14.05.2003Bundessozialgericht22. August 2003
18.07.1996Hessisches Landessozialgericht29.01.1998BundessozialgerichtB 12 KR 10/98 R08.12.1999Bundessozialgericht22. August 2003
21.11.199623.06.1998BundessozialgerichtB 12 KR 21/98 R10.08.2000Bundessozialgericht22. August 2003
07.12.1997Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg19.08.1997BundessozialgerichtB 12 KR 25/98 R08.12.1999Bundessozialgericht22. August 2003
22.05.1997Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg30.07.1998BundessozialgerichtB 12 KR 29/98 R27.01.2000Bundessozialgericht22. August 2003
Sozialgericht HannoverS 5 KA 1046/9929.08.2001Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-BremenL 3 KA 74/0126.10.1999BundessozialgerichtB 6 KA 30/02 R02.04.2003Bundessozialgericht22. August 2003
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3575 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3575 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3575 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 67/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-67-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:24:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:24:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-67-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 76/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-76-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:33:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:33:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-76-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VG 4/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vg-4-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vg-4-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SB 388/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-sb-388-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-sb-388-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 172/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-172-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-172-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 KR 251/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-kr-251-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-kr-251-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 P 64/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-p-64-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-p-64-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 U 267/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-u-267-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-u-267-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 KA 88/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ka-88-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ka-88-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135274 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 KA 229/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ka-229-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ka-229-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 KA 19/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ka-19-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ka-19-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135261 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 KA 193/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ka-193-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ka-193-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 KA 15/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ka-15-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ka-15-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 (10) KA 77/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-10-ka-77-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-10-ka-77-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 112/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-112-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:32:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:32:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-112-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 VG 266/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-vg-266-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-vg-266-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 (16,39) RA 266/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-1639-ra-266-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-1639-ra-266-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 141/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-141-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-141-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 P 155/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-p-155-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-p-155-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 55/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-55-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-55-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 10/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-10-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:55:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:55:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-10-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 21/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-21-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:55:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:55:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-21-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 25/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-25-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:55:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:55:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-25-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 29/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-29-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:55:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:55:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-29-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82472 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 30/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-30-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:52:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:52:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-30-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81518 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 67/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-67-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:24:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:24:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-67-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 069b1812bd57ee36422bcf34bddec1c5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )