| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 LW 1825/98 | 05.11.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 6/00 R | 11.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 LW 19/00 | 05.04.2001 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 14/01 R | 11.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 LW 26/97 | 20.04.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 LW 24/98 | 04.08.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 1/00 R | 07.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 (12) RJ 185/96 | 10.08.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 RJ 76/01 | 29.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 144/02 B | 11.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 10 RJ 205/99 | 06.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 6 RJ 85/01 | 30.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 18/02 R | 09.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 RJ 127/98 | 06.11.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 RJ 7/02 | 26.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 32/02 R | 09.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 13 (38) RJ 250/99 | 10.01.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 RJ 19/01 | 14.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 42/01 R | 11.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 9 R 109/94 | 30.05.1996 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 115/96 | 10.05.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 14/00 R | 11.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 RA 1624/98 | 26.06.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 6 RA 121/00 | 18.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 43/02 R | 10.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 11 RA 2840/97 | 10.12.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 RA 4/00 | 11.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 65/02 R | 14.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 3 RA 3362/98 | 10.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 RA 4794/00 | 18.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 39/02 R | 17.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 RA 1804/00 | 20.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 RA 3521/01 | 18.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 49/02 R | 30.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 2 RA 15/98 | 15.09.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 RA 203/99 | 10.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 26/02 R | 14.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 5 RA 168/99 | 18.05.2000 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 RA 134/00 | 30.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 54/01 R | 31.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 RA 3075/99 | 22.03.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 RA 2881/00 | 26.07.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 46/01 R | 17.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RA 229/97 | 18.02.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 76/99 | 10.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 120/00 R | 30.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 11 RA 276/00 | 27.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RA 58/01 | 08.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 9 KR 25/95 | 24.03.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 14/99 | 16.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 14 RJ 401/99 | 26.07.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 RJ 147/00 | 08.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 6 KN 135/99 | 21.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 KN 13/01 | 22.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | 16.07.1998 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | 27.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 2/00 R | 28.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 10.09.1997 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 25.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VS 1/00 R | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | 29.06.1999 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 30.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 1/00 R | 19.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 10.11.1998 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 09.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 4/00 R | 15.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 29.08.1996 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29.08.1996 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 8/00 R | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3578 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3578 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3578 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89425, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 6/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-6-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-6-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 14/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-14-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-14-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 1/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-1-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-1-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 144/02 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-144-02-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-144-02-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81447 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 18/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-18-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-18-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 32/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-32-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-32-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 42/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-42-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-42-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 14/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-14-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-14-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 43/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-43-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-43-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 65/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-65-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-65-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 39/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-39-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-39-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 49/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-49-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-49-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 26/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-26-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:19:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:19:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-26-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 54/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-54-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:18:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:18:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-54-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 46/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-46-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:18:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:18:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-46-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 120/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-120-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:17:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:17:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-120-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99359 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RA 58/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ra-58-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ra-58-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 14/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-14-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-14-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 RJ 147/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-rj-147-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:40:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:40:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-rj-147-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KN 13/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-kn-13-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-kn-13-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 2/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-2-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-2-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VS 1/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vs-1-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vs-1-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 1/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-1-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-1-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 4/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-4-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-4-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 8/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-8-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-8-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81505 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 6/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-6-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-6-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 76f7059e539f1b41f67637186a3379a1 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.