| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 SF 156/19 | 25.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 23. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 R 1190/18 | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 23. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 384/18 | 14.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 305/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 384/18 | 14.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 305/19 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 8 P 49/19 | 23.07.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 50/19 | 30.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 112/10 | 06.05.2011 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 105/16 ZVW | 30.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 10 R 4112/15 | 21.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 749/17 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 2/20 B | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 34 SF 61/18 E | 22.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 AY 8/20 B | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 41 SO 291/19 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 62/20 NZB | 04.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 41 SO 291/19 | 20.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 62/20 NZB | 12.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 59/20 S | 23.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 R 978/16 | 16.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 73/18 | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 22. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 R 239/19 | 30.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 22. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 BA 29/18 | 21.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 BA 113/19 | 14.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 RF 8/18 | 18.07.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 263/19 | 15.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 736/18 | 05.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 405/19 | 27.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 KR 871/18 | 14.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4533/18 | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 22/19 R | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 22. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 AS 377/15 | 27.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 306/16 | 09.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 21. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 4 SB 1949/15 | 10.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 93/19 | 03.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 15 R 1247/12 | 16.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 868/16 B | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 187/20 ER | 28.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 807/20 B ER und L 7 AS 808/20 B | 05.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AL 104/08 | 17.08.2010 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 196/10 | 29.10.2012 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 21/12 R | 11.03.2014 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 31 AS 4955/10 ER | 20.12.2010 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 74/11 B ER | 06.04.2011 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 21. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 24 AL 510/18 | 09.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 21. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 10 SB 1626/17 | 07.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 21. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 U 6/06 | 26.10.2010 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 56/16 | 30.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 148/20 B | 13.10.2020 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 21. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 358 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 358 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 358 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SF 156/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-sf-156-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-sf-156-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 1190/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-1190-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-1190-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 305/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-305-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-305-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 305/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-305-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-305-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 50/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-50-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-50-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 105/16 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-105-16-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-105-16-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RE 2/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-re-2-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-re-2-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 8/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-8-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-8-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 62/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-62-20-nzb-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-62-20-nzb-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 62/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-62-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-62-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 R 978/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-r-978-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-r-978-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 239/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-239-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-239-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 BA 113/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-ba-113-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-ba-113-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 263/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-263-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-263-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 405/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-405-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-405-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87500 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 22/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-22-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-22-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 306/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-306-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-306-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146136 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 93/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-93-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-93-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 868/16 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-868-16-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-868-16-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 807/20 B ER und L 7 AS 808/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-807-20-b-er-und-l-7-as-808-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-807-20-b-er-und-l-7-as-808-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AL 104/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-al-104-08 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-al-104-08/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 4955/10 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-4955-10-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-4955-10-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 AL 510/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-al-510-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-al-510-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SB 1626/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sb-1626-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sb-1626-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 6/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-6-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-6-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SF 156/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-sf-156-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-sf-156-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 152f3141f920a3b41a679140a64c60a2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6282112361540364defdfa8dcfa055c8:0.64618900 1758081273 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.