| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 6 U 4183/97 | 13.01.1999 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 U 674/99 | 13.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 7/02 R | 06.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 RA 124/98 | 25.02.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 RA 93/00 BVA | 29.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 16/01 R | 31.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | 18.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 05.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 5/02 R | 12.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 1/02 R | 21.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | 30.11.1994 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VJ 1/02 R | 21.08.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 23.05.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VG 2/02 R | 12.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 25.05.2000 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 26.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VG 5/01 R | 24.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VG 1/01 B | 08.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 159/99 | 07.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 18/00 | 06.03.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 13/02 R | 21.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 107/98 | 10.03.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 95/00 | 11.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 7/02 R | 23.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 KR 15/98 | 28.10.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 25/99 | 03.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 26/02 R | 26.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 KR 42/01 | 27.02.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 10/02 R | 28.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KR 3011/99 | 25.01.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 829/00 | 09.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 14/02 R | 21.11.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 3 KR 92/99 | 18.12.2000 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 4/01 | 22.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 18/02 R | 23.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 1 KR 22/00 | 19.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 46/01 | 27.05.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 25/02 R | 26.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 4 K 174/98 | 26.05.2000 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 64/00 | 08.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 1/02 R | 19.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 1 KR 44/98 | 25.11.1998 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 252/98 | 19.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 33/01 R | 25.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 KA 2553/98 | 02.12.1998 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 442/99 | 13.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 30/01 R | 11.09.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 4 U 224/00 | 09.02.2001 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 U 37/01 | 21.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 13/02 R | 18.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 7 U 97/01 | 28.02.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 35/02 R | 06.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 3620/94 | 27.01.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 578/98 | 12.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 12/02 R | 03.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 13 U 290/96 | 28.09.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 419/98 | 20.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 23/02 R | 03.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 13 U 1005/98 | 18.02.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 409/99 | 19.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 15/02 R | 18.03.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 2391/99 | 03.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 4249/00 | 28.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 22/02 R | 06.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 13 RA 3793/98 | 31.08.2000 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 RA 1502/00 | 29.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 6/02 R | 29.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3580 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3580 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3580 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 7/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-7-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-7-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 16/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-16-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-16-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 5/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-5-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-5-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 1/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-1-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-1-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VJ 1/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vj-1-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vj-1-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VG 2/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vg-2-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vg-2-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VG 5/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vg-5-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vg-5-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VG 1/01 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vg-1-01-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vg-1-01-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 13/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-13-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:38:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:38:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-13-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 7/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-7-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:37:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:37:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-7-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 26/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-26-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:37:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:37:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-26-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 10/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-10-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:37:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:37:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-10-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 14/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-14-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:37:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:37:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-14-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 18/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-18-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:37:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:37:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-18-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81966 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 25/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-25-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:37:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:37:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-25-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 1/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-1-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:36:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:36:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-1-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 33/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-33-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:36:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:36:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-33-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 30/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-30-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:33:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:33:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-30-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81623 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 13/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-13-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:27:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:27:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-13-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 35/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-35-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:27:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:27:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-35-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 12/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-12-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:27:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:27:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-12-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 23/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-23-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:27:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:27:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-23-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 15/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-15-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:27:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:27:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-15-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 22/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-22-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:27:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:27:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-22-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81414 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 6/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-6-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-6-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 7/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-7-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:47:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:47:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-7-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0b0a4933f0e6d18eab7507fcd688b261 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.