| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 28.01.1997 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 60/00 R | 14.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 09.11.1999 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26.07.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 71/00 R | 03.05.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| 11.09.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24.08.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 79/00 R | 22.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 100/00 R | 09.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | 08.01.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 31.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 97/00 R | 20.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| 11.07.1996 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 23/00 R | 02.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | 26.02.1998 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 15.10.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 27/00 R | 08.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| 02.12.1998 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 10.03.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 30/00 R | 08.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | 06.05.1998 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 25.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 63/00 R | 14.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 70/00 R | 22.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| 27.10.1998 | 25.07.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 89/00 R | 20.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | 10.11.1997 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 28.01.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 (7) AL 30/99 R | 14.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | 25.11.1998 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 30.06.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 87/99 R | 02.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | 14.01.1999 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28.10.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 111/99 R | 08.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 LW 189/99 | 13.12.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 LW 5/01 | 18.07.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 7/02 R | 25.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 LW 89/99 | 02.12.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 LW 4/00 | 18.10.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 5/01 R | 16.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 LW 169/95 | 23.11.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 LW 12/00 | 22.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 9/01 R | 11.12.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Neubrandenburg | 29.10.1999 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 14.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 13/01 R | 29.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | 10.02.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 17/01 R | 16.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 25.02.1999 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 25.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 24/01 R | 17.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 LW 21/99 | 30.04.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 LW 14/00 | 22.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 4/01 R | 17.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 30.03.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 8/01 R | 08.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18.01.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 3/01 R | 08.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 30.03.1999 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 7/01 R | 08.11.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18.01.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 2/01 R | 26.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3593 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3593 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3593 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 60/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-60-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-60-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 71/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-71-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-71-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 79/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-79-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-79-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 100/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-100-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-100-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 97/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-97-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-97-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 23/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-23-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-23-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 27/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-27-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-27-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 30/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-30-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-30-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 63/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-63-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-63-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 70/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-70-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-70-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81688 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 89/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-89-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-89-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 (7) AL 30/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-7-al-30-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-7-al-30-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 87/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-87-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-87-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 111/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-111-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-111-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 7/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-7-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-7-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81503 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 5/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-5-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-5-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 9/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-9-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-9-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 13/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-13-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-13-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81500 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 17/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-17-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-17-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 24/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-24-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-24-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 4/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-4-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-4-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 8/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-8-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-8-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 3/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-3-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-3-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81495 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 7/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-7-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-7-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 2/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-2-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-2-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81700 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 60/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-60-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:29:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:29:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-60-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 39e82ed5c1c9fc1e3b8fd349d1950ccb [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.