Erste InstanzAktenzeichen (1. Instanz)Datum (1. Instanz)Zweite InstanzAktenzeichen (2. Instanz)Datum (2. Instanz)Dritte InstanzAktenzeichen (3. Instanz)Datum (3. Instanz)GerichtErstellt
Sozialgericht Augsburg04.08.1999-BundessozialgerichtB 10 LW 15/99 R06.02.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht München09.09.1999-BundessozialgerichtB 10 LW 19/99 R06.02.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Ulm26.02.1997Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg14.05.1998BundessozialgerichtB 10 LW 18/99 R12.06.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Augsburg12.07.1999-BundessozialgerichtB 10 LW 13/99 R06.02.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Speyer07.07.1995Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz22.01.1998BundessozialgerichtB 10 LW 17/99 R07.12.2000Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Regensburg07.05.1999-BundessozialgerichtB 10 LW 8/99 R06.02.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe17.06.1996Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg17.01.2001BundessozialgerichtB 5 RJ 36/02 R09.04.2003Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
24.06.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg30.11.1999BundessozialgerichtB 5 RJ 6/00 R25.07.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Rostock19.07.2001Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern13.02.2002BundessozialgerichtB 4 RA 25/02 R31.07.2002Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Leipzig10.04.2002-BundessozialgerichtB 4 RA 50/02 R18.06.2003Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Leipzig17.07.2000-BundessozialgerichtB 4 RA 117/00 R12.06.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht Berlin08.07.1999-BundessozialgerichtB 4 RA 45/99 R24.07.2001Bundessozialgericht19. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 81 KR 3690/0127.08.2002Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Berlin18. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 77 AL 2861/0129.10.2002Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Berlin18. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 77 AL 3761/0125.11.2002Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Berlin18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 8 RA 67/9904.02.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 8 AL 88/0110.02.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 7 (16,18) SB 120/0004.04.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 3 AL 129/0017.01.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 14 U 56/0122.05.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 14 (16) KR 104/0012.03.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 12 KA 14/0126.04.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht DetmoldS 11 KR 49/0119.04.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Detmold18. August 2003
Sozialgericht GelsenkirchenS 9 KN 18/02 P27.06.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen18. August 2003
Sozialgericht GelsenkirchenS 8 RA 35/0121.01.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen18. August 2003
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3595 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3595 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3595 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 15/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-15-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-15-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 19/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-19-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-19-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 18/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-18-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-18-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 13/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-13-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-13-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 17/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-17-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-17-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 8/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-8-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-8-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 36/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-36-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-36-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 6/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-6-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-6-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 25/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-25-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-25-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 50/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-50-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-50-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 117/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-117-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:17:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:17:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-117-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 45/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-45-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:16:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:16:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-45-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 3690/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-3690-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:01:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:01:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-3690-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 2861/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-2861-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:01:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:01:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-2861-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 3761/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-3761-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:01:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:01:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-3761-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 67/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-67-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-67-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 88/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-88-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-88-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 (16,18) SB 120/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-1618-sb-120-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-1618-sb-120-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 129/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-129-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-129-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137625 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 56/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-56-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-56-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 (16) KR 104/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-16-kr-104-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-16-kr-104-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 14/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-14-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-14-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 49/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-49-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-49-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KN 18/02 P [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kn-18-02-p [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kn-18-02-p/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 35/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-35-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-35-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 15/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-15-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-15-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b699fae6bd4e8176459ba4745cb4ecb0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )