| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | 04.08.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 15/99 R | 06.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht München | 09.09.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 19/99 R | 06.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | 26.02.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14.05.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 18/99 R | 12.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | 12.07.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 13/99 R | 06.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | 07.07.1995 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 22.01.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 17/99 R | 07.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | 07.05.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 8/99 R | 06.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 17.06.1996 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17.01.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 36/02 R | 09.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| 24.06.1999 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RJ 6/00 R | 25.07.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Rostock | 19.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 13.02.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 25/02 R | 31.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 10.04.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 50/02 R | 18.06.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | 17.07.2000 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 117/00 R | 12.06.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | 08.07.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 45/99 R | 24.07.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 3690/01 | 27.08.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 2861/01 | 29.10.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AL 3761/01 | 25.11.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 RA 67/99 | 04.02.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AL 88/01 | 10.02.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 7 (16,18) SB 120/00 | 04.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 AL 129/00 | 17.01.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 56/01 | 22.05.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 (16) KR 104/00 | 12.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 12 KA 14/01 | 26.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 KR 49/01 | 19.04.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 9 KN 18/02 P | 27.06.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 8 RA 35/01 | 21.01.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3595 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3595 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3595 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 15/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-15-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-15-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 19/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-19-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-19-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 18/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-18-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-18-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 13/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-13-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-13-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 17/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-17-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-17-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 8/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-8-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-8-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 36/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-36-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:21:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:21:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-36-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RJ 6/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rj-6-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rj-6-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 25/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-25-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-25-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 50/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-50-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:20:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:20:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-50-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 117/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-117-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:17:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:17:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-117-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 45/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-45-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:16:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:16:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-45-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 KR 3690/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-kr-3690-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:01:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:01:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-kr-3690-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 2861/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-2861-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:01:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:01:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-2861-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 AL 3761/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-al-3761-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:01:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:01:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-al-3761-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 67/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-67-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-67-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 88/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-88-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-88-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 (16,18) SB 120/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-1618-sb-120-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-1618-sb-120-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 129/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-129-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-129-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137625 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 56/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-56-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-56-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 (16) KR 104/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-16-kr-104-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-16-kr-104-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 14/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-14-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-14-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 49/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-49-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:57:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:57:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-49-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KN 18/02 P [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kn-18-02-p [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kn-18-02-p/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 35/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-35-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-35-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 15/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-15-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-15-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b699fae6bd4e8176459ba4745cb4ecb0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.