| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 SB 471/22 | 05.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 418/23 | 06.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 1 AL 90/22 | 25.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 214/22 | 12.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 39 KR 1163/15 | 19.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 352/21 | 25.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 KR 1540/23 ER | 04.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2893/23 ER-B | 25.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 12 SO 52/21 | 30.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 216/23 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 19 P 34/24 ER | 13.06.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 24/24 B ER | 08.07.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 25/22 | 31.10.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 193/22 | 30.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 33/24 B | 03.06.2024 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 23. Juli 2024 |
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 477/21 KL | 28.06.2024 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 45/24 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 4/24 ER | 26.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 125/24 B ER | 24.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 As 975/22 | 22.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 975/22 | 29.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 SF 89/24 | 20.06.2024 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 R 1151/20 | 03.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 661/22 | 03.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 3 SO 976/21 | 25.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1055/24 | 20.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 2063/20 | 14.11.2023 | L 1 U 3435/23 | 14.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 AS 190/24 ER | 24.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 566/24 B | 21.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 KR 4587/20 | 27.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3364/21 | 03.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 AS 520/24 ER | 27.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 1021/24 ER-B | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AS 2434/23 ER | 19.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 1248/24 ER-B | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 AY 1043/23 | 23.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 631/24 NZB | 28.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 701/22 | 01.12.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 19. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 AS 166/24 ER | 16.07.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 19. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 90 AY 126/21 | 18.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 18. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 19 P 34/24 ER | 10.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 18. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 148/20 | 25.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 18. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 25 KR 699/21 | 28.02.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 18. Juli 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 36 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 36 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 36 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 418/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-418-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-418-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 214/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-214-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-214-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 352/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-352-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-352-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160744 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2893/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2893-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2893-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 216/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-216-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-216-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150116 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 P 34/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-p-34-24-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-p-34-24-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 193/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-193-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-193-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 477/21 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-477-21-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-477-21-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 125/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-125-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-125-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 975/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-975-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-975-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 SF 89/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-sf-89-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-sf-89-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 661/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-661-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-661-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1055/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1055-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1055-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160736 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 3435/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-3435-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-3435-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 566/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-566-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-566-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3364/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3364-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3364-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1021/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1021-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1021-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1248/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1248-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1248-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 631/24 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-631-24-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-631-24-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 210 KR 701/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-210-kr-701-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-210-kr-701-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133721 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Eilrechtsschutz gegen die Begrenzung der Kosten der Unterkunft auf die Werte nach § 12 WoGG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => eilrechtsschutz-gegen-die-begrenzung-der-kosten-der-unterkunft-auf-die-werte-nach-%c2%a7-12-wogg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/eilrechtsschutz-gegen-die-begrenzung-der-kosten-der-unterkunft-auf-die-werte-nach-%c2%a7-12-wogg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 90 AY 126/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-90-ay-126-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-90-ay-126-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 P 34/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-p-34-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-p-34-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 148/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-148-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-148-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 699/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-699-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-699-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 418/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-418-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-418-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cd41d68c910a8b912af889618db47500 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b695f58497f5e11d1d3cc078a848bd88:0.09800200 1745175832 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.