| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 15 U 92/14 | 07.04.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 200/15 | 28.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 10/18 R | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 74 KR 1768/17 | 24.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 15. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 83 KR 6564/19 | 05.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 15. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 56/13 | 08.05.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 73/19 | 25.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 184/20 B | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 15. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 BA 237/19 | 10.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 15. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 37 AS 496/20 ER | 13.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 24/20 B | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 56/13 | 08.05.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 73/19 | 25.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 184/20 B | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2020 |
| S 65 AS 5261/17 | 17.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 2032/18 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Oktober 2020 | ||
| S 65 AS 5261/17 | 17.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 2032/18 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 18 AL 260/16 | 20.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 148/19 | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 32 R 3564/14 | 30.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 655/18 | 19.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 R 2074/16 | 04.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 139/19 | 19.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 374/13 | 10.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 974/16 | 19.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 17 KR 436/14 | 20.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 213/18 | 24.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 16/19 R | 16.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 663/14 | 14.06.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 57/16 | 15.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 12/19 R | 15.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 469/14 | 29.08.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 55/17 | 01.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 4/20 R | 15.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 U 33/14 | 28.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 52/17 | 21.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 14/18 R | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 120 AL 573/19 | 25.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 103/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 14. Oktober 2020 | |
| - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 AR 27/19 KO | 07.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Oktober 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 42 SO 125/20 ER | 12.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 174/20 B ER | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 50/18 | 27.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 60/18 B ER | 28.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KA 18/19 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 23/19 B ER | 17.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 63/17 | 24.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 14. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 R 3253/19 | 21.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 14. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 20/19 | 28.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 14/20 NZB | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 14. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 360 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 360 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 360 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 8975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 10/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-10-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-10-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137503 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 74 KR 1768/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-74-kr-1768-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-74-kr-1768-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137500 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KR 6564/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-kr-6564-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-kr-6564-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 56/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-56-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-56-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 BA 237/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ba-237-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ba-237-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 24/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-24-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:01:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:01:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-24-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 73/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-73-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-73-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 2032/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-2032-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-2032-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 2032/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-2032-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-2032-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 148/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-148-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-148-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 655/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-655-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-655-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 139/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-139-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-139-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 974/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-974-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-974-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 16/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-16-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-16-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 12/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-12-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-12-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87495 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 14/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-14-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-14-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 120 AL 573/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-120-al-573-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-120-al-573-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AR 27/19 KO [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ar-27-19-ko [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ar-27-19-ko/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 174/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-174-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-174-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 60/18 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-60-18-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-60-18-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 23/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-23-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-23-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 63/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-63-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-63-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 3253/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-3253-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-3253-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 20/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-20-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-20-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 10/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-10-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-10-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b848698b13b6571a55d839fb2fc96f56 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3205afc75e4267290efeadf73cca0bb9:0.20116600 1758091239 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.