Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht München | S 12 RA 1191/99 | 30.08.2001 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 RA 48/02 | 21.05.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 17 RA 494/94 | 26.04.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 RA 110/02 | 16.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 Ar 455/97 | 16.07.1998 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AL 85/98 | 14.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. August 2003 | |
17.07.1998 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 09.03.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 1/00 R | 13.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 KR 84/99 | 28.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 166/00 | 28.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 17/01 R | 24.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 |
- | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 88/98 | 28.10.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 2/00 B | 30.03.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 4215/97 | 24.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 7/00 R | 21.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 4222/97 | 15.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 13/00 R | 02.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 4073/97 | 15.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 17/00 R | 02.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 4242/97 | 24.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 9/00 R | 21.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 4236/97 | 24.11.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 11/00 R | 02.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 2931/97 | 15.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 15/00 R | 02.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 AL 414/97 | 18.05.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 33/00 R | 02.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Landshut | 28.07.1992 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21.10.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 RJ 19/99 R | 11.05.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
23.09.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 RJ 3432/97 | 19.10.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RJ 6/99 R | 15.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
29.04.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 RJ 1892/97 | 19.10.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 RJ 5/99 R | 15.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | 28.05.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29.01.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 11/99 R | 16.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | 25.03.1998 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 05.02.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 18/99 R | 16.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
Sozialgericht Koblenz | 30.10.1996 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 22.01.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 5/98 R | 16.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
- | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 SF 8/01 S | 08.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||||
- | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/1 SF 1/00 R | 05.12.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |||
Sozialgericht Hamburg | 16.12.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/1 A 1/00 R | 24.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |||
Sozialgericht Schwerin | 27.11.2000 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VG 1/01 R | 16.04.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 KR 50/99 | 28.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 152/00 | 23.10.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 3/02 R | 22.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 |
Sozialgericht München | S 2 KR 405/96 | 03.02.2000 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 89/00 | 31.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 17/02 R | 24.01.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3600 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3600 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3600 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 89975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 104910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 48/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-48-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:17:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:17:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-48-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 104856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 110/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-110-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:16:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:16:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-110-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 85/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-85-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:33:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:33:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-85-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 1/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-1-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:56:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:56:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-1-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 17/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-17-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:55:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:55:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-17-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 2/00 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-2-00-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:55:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:55:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-2-00-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 7/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-7-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:50:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:50:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-7-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 13/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-13-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:50:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:50:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-13-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 17/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-17-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:50:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:50:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-17-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 9/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-9-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:50:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:50:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-9-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 11/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-11-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:50:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:50:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-11-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82401 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 15/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-15-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:50:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:50:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-15-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 33/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-33-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:50:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:50:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-33-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 RJ 19/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-rj-19-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:45:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:45:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-rj-19-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RJ 6/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-rj-6-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:45:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:45:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-rj-6-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 RJ 5/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-rj-5-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:45:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:45:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-rj-5-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 11/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-11-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:43:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:43:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-11-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 RA 18/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-ra-18-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:42:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:42:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-ra-18-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 5/98 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-5-98-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-5-98-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 SF 8/01 S [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-sf-8-01-s [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-sf-8-01-s/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/1 SF 1/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-1-sf-1-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-1-sf-1-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/1 A 1/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-1-a-1-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-1-a-1-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VG 1/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vg-1-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:40:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:40:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vg-1-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 3/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-3-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:39:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:39:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-3-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82023 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 17/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-17-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:39:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:39:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-17-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 104910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 RA 48/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ra-48-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:17:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:17:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ra-48-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d97b4f11f2858c938af26f349759ef42 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.