| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Ulm | 23.01.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 23/00 R | 22.08.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 27.07.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 19/99 R | 14.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 27.07.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 17/99 R | 14.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 41 KR 287/01 ER | 30.10.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 155/01 | 02.08.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 241/02 | 02.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 SF 3/00 F | 11.09.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 SF 17/99 F | 20.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 SF 12/99 F | 04.04.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 V 65/98 | 23.05.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 14.09.2000 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27.09.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VS 6/01 R | 12.02.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Trier | 17.01.2000 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 25.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 12/01 R | 25.07.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | 11.06.1999 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 11/99 R | 06.02.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | 22.03.1999 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 08.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 11/00 R | 17.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | 21.04.1997 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22.01.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 10/99 R | 02.12.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | 12.04.2002 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 10/02 R | 16.10.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 16.12.1997 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 10/01 R | 29.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | 24.09.1998 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 10/00 R | 07.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | 28.05.1998 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 20.04.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 KR 3/99 R | 07.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | 30.01.1996 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20.05.1999 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 KR 2/99 R | 17.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 25.11.1997 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 04.08.1998 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 7/01 R | 29.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | 19.03.1996 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22.08.1997 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 5/01 R | 29.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13.06.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/02 R | 24.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | |||
| Sozialgericht München | 06.05.1993 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 01.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/01 R | 29.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | 16.12.1992 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19.12.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 2/01 R | 29.01.2002 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. August 2003 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 7 RJ 222/01 | 05.09.2002 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 RJ 511/02 | 08.04.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. August 2003 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3603 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3603 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3603 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 90050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 23/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-23-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:15:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:15:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-23-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 19/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-19-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:15:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:15:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-19-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 17/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-17-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:15:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:15:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-17-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 KR 287/01 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-kr-287-01-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-kr-287-01-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 104901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 241/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-241-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:17:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:17:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-241-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SF 3/00 F [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sf-3-00-f [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:39:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:39:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sf-3-00-f/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SF 17/99 F [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sf-17-99-f [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:39:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:39:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sf-17-99-f/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SF 12/99 F [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sf-12-99-f [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:39:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:39:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sf-12-99-f/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 V 65/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-v-65-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:39:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:39:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-v-65-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 VS 6/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-vs-6-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-vs-6-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 12/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-12-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-12-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 11/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-11-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-11-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 11/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-11-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-11-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 10/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-10-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-10-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82094 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 10/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-10-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-10-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 10/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-10-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-10-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82092 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 10/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-10-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-10-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82091 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 KR 3/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-kr-3-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-kr-3-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82090 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 KR 2/99 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-kr-2-99-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-kr-2-99-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 7/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-7-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-7-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 5/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-5-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-5-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82086 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 3/02 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-3-02-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-3-02-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82085 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 3/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-3-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-3-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 82084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 2/01 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-2-01-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:41:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:41:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-2-01-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 105035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 RJ 511/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-rj-511-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 14:18:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 13:18:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-rj-511-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 81286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 23/00 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-23-00-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 22:15:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 21:15:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-23-00-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1cc92682b3f2c1ba6b6cd987a8862441 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.