Erste InstanzAktenzeichen (1. Instanz)Datum (1. Instanz)Zweite InstanzAktenzeichen (2. Instanz)Datum (2. Instanz)Dritte InstanzAktenzeichen (3. Instanz)Datum (3. Instanz)GerichtErstellt
Sozialgericht BerlinS 55 Z-Ar 28/90 - W 9626.08.1997Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 14 AL 108/9730.03.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 66 AL 4275/0014.11.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 2/0217.12.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 80 AL 2317/0111.09.2002Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 87/0212.02.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 53 AL 4268/0009.10.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 102/0131.01.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 53 AL 798/0008.05.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 58/0117.12.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 64 AL 47/9907.12.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 15/0128.09.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 51 AL 130/9921.06.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 131/0031.01.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 62 AL 1072/9908.12.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 47/0031.01.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 77 AL 1481/9819.11.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 12/9914.04.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 56 Ar 2819/9815.12.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 58/9928.07.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 57 AL 3911/9719.11.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 10/9914.04.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 58 AL 2008/9829.01.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 80/9901.12.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 57 AL 4535/9817.06.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 211/9913.07.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 56 Ar 1069/9730.06.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 70/9819.11.1999Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 52 Ar 2116/9814.09.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 10 AL 93/9814.04.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 32 RJ 968/97-2119.03.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RJ 27/0125.11.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 11 RA 1840/0004.09.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RA 77/0021.05.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 27 RJ 812/9609.05.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RJ 57/0020.12.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 19/25/26 RJ 871/9705.11.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 B 121/99 RJ08.05.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 13 RA 277/9823.06.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RA 52/9912.05.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 28 RJ 919/9617.08.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RJ 100/9920.07.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 36/5/12 RA 3053/9527.07.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RA 53/9916.10.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 23 RJ 476/9711.08.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RJ 98/9928.02.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 32 RJ 1602/97-2222.02.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RJ 41/9917.09.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 38 An 7786/9524.09.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 16 RA 2/9927.03.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg13. August 2003
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3610 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3610 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3610 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 90225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 108/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-108-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-108-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 2/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-2-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-2-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 87/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-87-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-87-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 102/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-102-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-102-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99136 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 58/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-58-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-58-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 15/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-15-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-15-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 131/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-131-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-131-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 47/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-47-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-47-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 12/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-12-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-12-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99129 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 58/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-58-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-58-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 10/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-10-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:33:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:33:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-10-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 80/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-80-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:33:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:33:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-80-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 211/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-211-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:33:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:33:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-211-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 70/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-70-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:33:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:33:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-70-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 93/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-93-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:33:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:33:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-93-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 27/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-27-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:30:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:30:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-27-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98990 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 77/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-77-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:30:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:30:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-77-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 57/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-57-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:30:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:30:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-57-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 B 121/99 RJ [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-b-121-99-rj [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:30:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:30:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-b-121-99-rj/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 52/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-52-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:30:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:30:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-52-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98986 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 100/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-100-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:30:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:30:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-100-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98984 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 53/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-53-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:29:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:29:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-53-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 98/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-98-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:29:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:29:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-98-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RJ 41/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-rj-41-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:29:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:29:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-rj-41-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 98981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 RA 2/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ra-2-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:29:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:29:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ra-2-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 108/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-108-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:34:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:34:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-108-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ff2f8211f6b3b6347144fea3befa47c1 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )