Erste InstanzAktenzeichen (1. Instanz)Datum (1. Instanz)Zweite InstanzAktenzeichen (2. Instanz)Datum (2. Instanz)Dritte InstanzAktenzeichen (3. Instanz)Datum (3. Instanz)GerichtErstellt
Sozialgericht DortmundS 8 KR 38/0116.05.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 6 KN 41/02 KR19.02.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 KA 44/0217.01.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 (10) KA 4/0126.02.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 26 (10) KA 99/0024.04.2001Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 31 AL 101/0209.07.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 27 AL 108/0226.06.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 5 AL 202/0206.12.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 5 AL 131/0206.12.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 5 AL 264/0112.07.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 5 AL 390/0012.10.2001Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 5 AL 304/0023.03.2001Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 23 U 65/0230.06.2003Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 23 U 9/0121.10.2002Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht DortmundS 23 (11) U 59/0019.11.2001Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Dortmund12. August 2003
Sozialgericht GelsenkirchenS 24 KR 173/0107.12.2001Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen12. August 2003
Sozialgericht GelsenkirchenS 17 KR 166/0108.11.2001Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen-Bundessozialgericht-Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 88 KR 1171/9926.05.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 9 KR 70/0002.04.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht Berlin25.04.2002Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 B 11/02 SF02.05.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 81/9607.11.1996Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 3 U 1/9725.11.1999Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 1021/9625.07.1997Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 3 U 81/9717.08.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 406/9606.10.1997Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 3 U 107/9707.09.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 70 U 699/9429.04.1995Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 3 U 57/9503.05.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 25 U 82/0029.11.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 29/0217.12.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 22 U 316/9920.08.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 137/0105.11.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3612 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3612 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3612 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 90275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 38/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-38-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-38-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KN 41/02 KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kn-41-02-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kn-41-02-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 KA 44/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ka-44-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ka-44-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 (10) KA 4/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-10-ka-4-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-10-ka-4-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135113 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 (10) KA 99/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-10-ka-99-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-10-ka-99-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AL 101/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-al-101-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-al-101-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AL 108/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-al-108-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-al-108-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 202/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-202-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-202-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 131/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-131-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:30:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:30:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-131-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 264/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-264-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:30:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:30:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-264-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 390/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-390-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:30:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:30:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-390-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 304/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-304-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:30:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:30:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-304-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 65/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-65-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:30:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:30:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-65-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 9/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-9-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:30:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:30:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-9-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 (11) U 59/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-11-u-59-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:30:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:30:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-11-u-59-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 KR 173/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-kr-173-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-kr-173-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 166/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-166-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-166-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 70/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-70-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:39:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:39:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-70-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99335 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 B 11/02 SF [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-b-11-02-sf [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:39:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:39:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-b-11-02-sf/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 1/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-1-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-1-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 81/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-81-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-81-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 107/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-107-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-107-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 57/95 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-57-95 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-57-95/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 29/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-29-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-29-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 137/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-137-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-137-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 38/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-38-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:31:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:31:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-38-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1cc6c4b90e01f93bb8e594e7e8601001 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )