Erste InstanzAktenzeichen (1. Instanz)Datum (1. Instanz)Zweite InstanzAktenzeichen (2. Instanz)Datum (2. Instanz)Dritte InstanzAktenzeichen (3. Instanz)Datum (3. Instanz)GerichtErstellt
Sozialgericht BerlinS 25 U 782/9715.03.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 72/0105.11.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 168/9920.10.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 11/0125.03.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 460/0025.05.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 104/0125.03.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 67 U 388/99-1508.08.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 122/0126.11.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 15 U 438/9921.08.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 10/0116.10.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 313/9927.10.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 3/0125.03.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 25 U 932/9930.11.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 33/0117.12.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 67 U 118/0015.06.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 107/0105.11.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 22 U 356/0128.09.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 143/0114.01.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 270/0103.08.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 152/0126.11.2002Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 573/9910.01.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 16/0018.09.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 503/9931.03.2000Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 43/0024.07.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 8 U 918/9702.12.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 5/0014.01.2003Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 373/9801.02.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 25/9908.02.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht Berlin09.08.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 89/9918.04.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 839/9825.03.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 50/9918.04.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 27 U 879/9726.01.1999Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 38/9908.08.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 68 U 707/9723.10.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 95/9808.02.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 67 U 158/9519.08.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 66/9818.01.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 83/9702.02.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 24/9818.04.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht Berlin28.10.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 92/9818.04.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 8 U 415/9702.03.1998Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 36/9818.01.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 69 U 223/9607.03.1997Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 43/9716.05.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 68 U 410/9626.08.1997Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 2 U 110/9708.02.2000Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Sozialgericht BerlinS 35 RA 2849/0011.01.2001Landessozialgericht Berlin-BrandenburgL 17 RA 7/0122.08.2001Bundessozialgericht-Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg12. August 2003
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3613 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3613 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 3613 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 90300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 72/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-72-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-72-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 11/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-11-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-11-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 104/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-104-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-104-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 122/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-122-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-122-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 10/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-10-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-10-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 3/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-3-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-3-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 33/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-33-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-33-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 107/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-107-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-107-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 143/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-143-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-143-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 152/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-152-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-152-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 16/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-16-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-16-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 43/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-43-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-43-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 5/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-5-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-5-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99053 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 25/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-25-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-25-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 89/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-89-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-89-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 50/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-50-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-50-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99050 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 38/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-38-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-38-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 95/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-95-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-95-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 66/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-66-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-66-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 24/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-24-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-24-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 92/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-92-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-92-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 36/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-36-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-36-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 43/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-43-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-43-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 110/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-110-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:31:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:31:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-110-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 RA 7/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-ra-7-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:30:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:30:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-ra-7-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 99066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2003-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2003-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 72/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-72-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 00:32:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 23:32:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-72-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 34c7552d8bc0c52c1abf99b73e95f038 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )