| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 21 KR 1618/19 ER | 19.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 196/20 B ER | 10.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 5 AS 832/19 | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1021/20 NZB | 28.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 436/16 | 14.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 256/17 | 31.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 9. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 17 KR 512/17 WA | 29.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 637/19 | 18.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 16 R 715/16 | 19.05.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 5130/17 | 29.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 2 R 2399/13 | 23.09.2014 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 590/17 | 13.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 5/18 R | 12.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 436/15 | 17.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 303/17 | 16.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 30/19 R | 12.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 9. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 164/17 | 12.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 39/19 | 05.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 8. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 39 AS 3907/18 | 27.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 312/19 | 24.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 8. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 AS 40/17 | 17.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 51/19 | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 8. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 AS 4507/16 | 17.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 50/19 | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 8. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 AS 1635/15 | 17.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 49/19 | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 8. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 7 AY 66/15 | 22.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AY 4/19 | 17.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 8. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 KR 272/19 | 15.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 8. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 (23) AS 9/06 | 21.05.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 8. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 R 454/15 | 10.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 459/16 | 10.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 36 AL 1054/13 | 01.07.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 202/15 | 15.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 3/19 R | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 146/14 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 21/17 | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 43 VE 45/15 | 27.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 VE 5/19 | 15.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 35 AS 2133/17 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 249/19 | 30.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 53/19 R | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 204 AS 2252/14 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 717/17 | 21.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 359/17 | 11.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 7. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 43 VE 45/15 | 27.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 VE 5/19 | 15.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 7. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 AS 1417/19 | 02.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 7. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 5 AS 2203/18 | 25.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 7. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 363 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 363 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 363 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 196/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-196-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-196-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1021/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1021-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:10:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:10:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1021-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 436/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-436-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:53:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:53:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-436-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 637/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-637-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-637-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 5130/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-5130-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-5130-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87493 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 5/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-5-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-5-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87492 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 30/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-30-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-30-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 39/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-39-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-39-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 312/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-312-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-312-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 51/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-51-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-51-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 50/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-50-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-50-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 49/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-49-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:05:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:05:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-49-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AY 4/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ay-4-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ay-4-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 272/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-272-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-272-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 (23) AS 9/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-23-as-9-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-23-as-9-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 459/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-459-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-459-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87491 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 21/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-21-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-21-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 VE 5/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ve-5-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ve-5-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 249/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-249-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-249-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 204 AS 2252/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-204-as-2252-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:41:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:41:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-204-as-2252-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 359/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-359-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-359-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 43 VE 45/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-43-ve-45-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-43-ve-45-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AS 1417/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-as-1417-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-as-1417-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 2203/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-2203-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-2203-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 196/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-196-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:11:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:11:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-196-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ef8d4316836a40cf51613151a0f862c8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0a2a4f76c73a05d32955a699811387dd:0.40422400 1758100525 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.