Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 50 SO 935/20 ER | 13.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 124/20 B ER | 25.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 204 AS 2252/14 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 717/17 | 21.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 33 KR 673/17 | 07.11.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 130/18 | 31.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 321/18 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 438/19 | 05.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 RS 1267/16 | 19.08.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 606/19 ZV | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 R 1197/19 ZV | 07.02.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 145/20 ZV | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
S 9 U 787/16 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 949/18 | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 U 305/17 | 16.04.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 766/18 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 33 U 1251/18 | 09.07.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 960/19 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 3 U 3197/14 | 13.11.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 212/18 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 4195/14 | 24.10.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 131/18 | 24.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
- | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 18/18 | 12.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2020 | |||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 15 KR 52/20 ER | 17.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 181/20 B ER | 03.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 U 626/18 | 15.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 86/19 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 6/20 BH | 04.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2020 |
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 19 AS 1387/17 | 04.06.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 229/12 | 27.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 22/16 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 228/12 | 27.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 20/16 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 42 KR 158/20 | 30.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 316/20 B ER | 04.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 549/20 ER | 19.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 276/20 B ER | 24.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 51 KR 1615/14 | 03.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 181/18 | 28.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 51 KR 1615/14 | 03.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 181/18 | 28.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 4039/15 | 16.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 61/20 WA | 28.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 33 KR 417/15 | 25.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 462/17 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 31/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 1597/16 | 24.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 178/18 | 10.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 1636/16 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 214/17 | 02.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 364 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 364 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 364 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 124/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-124-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-124-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126821 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 717/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-717-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-717-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 130/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-130-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-130-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 438/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-438-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:10:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:10:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-438-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 606/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-606-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-606-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 145/20 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-145-20-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-145-20-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 949/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-949-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-949-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 766/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-766-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-766-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 960/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-960-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-960-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 212/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-212-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-212-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150952 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 131/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-131-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-131-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150950 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 18/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-18-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:00:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:00:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-18-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 181/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-181-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:10:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:10:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-181-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 86/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-86-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-86-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 1387/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-1387-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-1387-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 22/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-22-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-22-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 20/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-20-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-20-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 316/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-316-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-316-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 276/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-276-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-276-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 181/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-181-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-181-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 181/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-181-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-181-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 61/20 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-61-20-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-61-20-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 462/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-462-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-462-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 178/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-178-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-178-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 214/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-214-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-214-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 124/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-124-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-124-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b62ef8fe62fe7c484055bb2f29ea3b03 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d821015f58cb4621d9759304c1579493:0.26822000 1758106492 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.