| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 2317/16 WA | 06.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 3028/16 | 12.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 2317/16 WA | 06.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 3028/16 | 12.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 13 AL 502/17 | 26.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 131/18 | 20.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 41/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 321/18 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 2. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 307/15 | 10.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 406/16 | 14.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 2. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 3 SB 338/16 | 23.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 78/18 | 19.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 5/20 B | 01.07.2020 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 3 SB 314/16 | 17.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 10/17 | 12.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 22/19 B | 22.06.2020 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 47 AS 1594/18 | 03.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 2. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 R 1063/18 | 28.05.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 2. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 R 1882/18 | 14.05.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 2. Oktober 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1143/19 | 12.08.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 516/19 | 30.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 14 AS 1287/19 | 08.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 SF 283/20 AB | 24.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 203 AS 10329/16 | 20.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 1574/17 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 12/20 R | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 334/16 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 187/17 | 28.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 1/18 S | 13.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 10 KR 126/11 | 23.05.2013 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 252/13 | 27.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 26/18 R | 26.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Oktober 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 48 KR 1663/17 | 13.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 14/19 | 26.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 176/16 | 27.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 19/18 | 05.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 24 AS 2433/17 | 17.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 322/19 | 31.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 15 KR 348/16 | 16.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 679/18 | 09.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 24 AL 336/20 ER | 06.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 109/20 B ER | 17.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 17 R 236/15 | 23.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 6/18 | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 14 AS 158/20 ER | 28.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 SF 263/20 AB | 23.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 VS 10/10 | 16.07.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VS 14/14 | 26.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 3 BA 81/18 | 11.03.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 86/19 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Oktober 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 KR 221/16 | 21.07.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 558/17 | 14.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Oktober 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 365 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 365 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 365 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 3028/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-3028-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-3028-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126766 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 3028/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-3028-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-3028-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 131/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-131-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-131-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 321/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-321-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-321-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 307/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-307-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:52:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:52:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-307-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SB 338/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-sb-338-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-sb-338-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SB 314/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-sb-314-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-sb-314-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 AS 1594/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-as-1594-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-as-1594-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 1063/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-1063-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-1063-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 1882/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-1882-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-1882-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130318 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 516/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-516-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-516-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130317 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 283/20 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-283-20-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-283-20-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 12/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-12-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-12-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 1/18 S [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-1-18-s [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-1-18-s/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87488 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 26/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-26-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:02:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:02:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-26-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 14/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-14-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-14-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 19/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-19-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-19-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 322/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-322-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-322-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 146023 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 679/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-679-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:10:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:10:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-679-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AL 109/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-al-109-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:10:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:10:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-al-109-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 236/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-236-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-236-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 263/20 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-263-20-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-263-20-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VS 14/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vs-14-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vs-14-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 86/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-86-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-86-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 558/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-558-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-558-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126767 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 3028/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-3028-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-3028-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cec28b42967a890ba2138a28184f67b9 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ce8fff15669848111cc31e9e1011a4f2:0.22509000 1758106492 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.