Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 553/14 | 16.02.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 509/17 | 28.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 13/19 R | 19.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. September 2020 |
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 54/16 KL | 27.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 3/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 10 SO 60/15 (Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau) | 12.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 29/19 | 13.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 SO 29/20 ER | 20.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 21/20 B ER | 20.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 28 SO 18/15 | 25.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 51/19 | 27.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 219/14 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 22/17 | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 175/18 | 02.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 17. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 46/17 | 27.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 165/18 | 03.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 86/20 B | 06.08.2020 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 46/17 | 27.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 165/18 | 03.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 86/20 B | 06.08.2020 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 46/17 | 27.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 165/18 | 03.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 86/20 B | 06.08.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 96/14 | 27.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 455/17 | 10.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 1284/13 | 10.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 523/17 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 1341/16 | 22.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 62/18 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 311/17 | 17.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 408/17 | 14.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 232/18 | 18.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 112/18 | 17.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 EG 22/15 | 18.11.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 68/15 | 16.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 1/19 R | 25.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 32 SO 198/12 | 19.09.2014 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 371/14 | 26.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 12/18 R | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 387/18 WA | 05.06.2019 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 25/19 R | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 201/18 | 05.12.2018 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 3/19 R | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 127/18 | 05.12.2018 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 2/19 R | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 78 AS 338/17 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 17/19 | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 8/20 R | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Hannover | S 22 U 1/15 | 17.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 U 26/16 | 26.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 19/18 R | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 151/16 | 07.06.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 46/17 | 12.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 11/19 R | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 R 1321/13 | 04.05.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 444/16 | 26.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 1/19 R | 26.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 162 AS 31079/13 | 01.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 575/17 | 15.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 52/18 R | 20.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. September 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 372 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 372 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 372 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 13/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-13-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-13-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 A 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-a-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-a-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-29-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:44:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:44:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-29-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161565 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 21/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-21-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-21-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 51/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-51-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-51-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159084 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 22/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-22-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:04:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:04:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-22-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 87 KA 175/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-87-ka-175-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-87-ka-175-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 46/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-46-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-46-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134481 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 46/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-46-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-46-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 165/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-165-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-165-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 455/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-455-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-455-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 523/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-523-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-523-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 62/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-62-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-62-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 408/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-408-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-408-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126704 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 112/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-112-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-112-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 12/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-12-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-12-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 25/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-25-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-25-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87460 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87459 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87457 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 8/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-8-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-8-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 19/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-19-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-19-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 11/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-11-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-11-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87439 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 52/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-52-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-52-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 13/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-13-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-13-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d457f3bbdb1482ade86911536a48c9df [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1f9a6f6a50a500676424e3f372f99055:0.02629100 1758133456 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.