Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 17 R 3179/16 | 31.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 176/18 | 08.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 10/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 5 AS 3997/12 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 89/15 | 23.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 U 102/99 | 28.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 13/02 | 11.08.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 7 AS 1732/12 | 13.07.2012 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 11/16 | 17.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 27 AS 2440/17 | 04.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 438/19 | 17.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 7 AS 2833/12 | 16.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 850/15 | 17.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 87/19 B; B 14 AS 88/19 B | 13.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 24 AS 1574/15 | 16.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 346/17 | 07.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 SO 99/18 | 01.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 87/19 NZB | 27.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 SO 168/17 | 24.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 31/19 | 05.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 32/20 B | 23.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 11 SF 811/15 E | 21.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 319/18 B | 30.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 29/17 | 13.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 160/18 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 56/09 | 18.09.2009 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 13/16 | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 77/19 B | 21.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 1103/17 | 05.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 15/19 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 SV 123/18 WA | 01.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SV 1/19 | 16.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 20/19 BH | 21.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 16 AS 2470/18 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 68/20 | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 AL 1952/19 | 19.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 109/20 | 29.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 47 AS 1594/18 | 03.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 525/20 B | 03.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 22 AL 405/17 | 13.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 189/18 | 20.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 U 538/14 | 23.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 47/19 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 228/19 | 27.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 14. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1684/18 | 23.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 14. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 111/19 | 16.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 14. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 2143/18 | 23.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 14. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 44 AL 285/18 | 19.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 14. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 69 AS 941/18 | 22.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 470/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 14. September 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 375 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 375 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 375 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 176/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-176-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-176-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 89/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-89-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-89-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 13/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-13-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-13-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 11/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-11-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-11-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161550 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 438/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-438-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-438-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 850/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-850-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-850-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 346/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-346-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-346-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161533 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 87/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-87-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-87-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 31/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-31-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-31-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 319/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-319-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-319-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 160/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-160-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-160-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 13/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-13-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-13-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 15/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-15-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-15-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SV 1/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sv-1-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sv-1-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 68/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-68-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-68-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 109/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-109-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-109-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 525/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-525-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-525-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 189/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-189-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-189-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 47/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-47-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-47-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143262 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 228/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-228-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-228-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 1684/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-1684-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-1684-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 111/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-111-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-111-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 2143/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-2143-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-2143-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 AL 285/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-al-285-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-al-285-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 69 AS 941/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-69-as-941-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-69-as-941-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 176/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-176-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-176-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f80567d6d92b4a006a1154b18cdea883 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3042fca78e83a6afd939e0a11aa5c195:0.48981600 1758171220 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.