Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 118/20 ER | 11.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 114/20 B ER | 20.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 118/20 ER | 11.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 114/20 B ER | 20.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 3 U 44/09 | 31.08.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 162/12 | 29.08.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 246/13 B | 17.12.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 14. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 149 AS 4453/17 | 10.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 2067/19 | 22.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 209/16 | 07.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 152/17 | 17.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 1/16 | 18.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 4/17 | 11.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 170/20 B | 30.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 20 R 1207/17 | 19.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 255/18 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 6/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 16 KR 4202/15 | 20.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 4463/17 ZVW | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 30 VH 1/13 | 07.05.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VH 1/15 | 12.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 21 KR 333/14 | 15.12.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 177/18 | 03.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 4 KN 92/16 | 21.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 566/19 | 22.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 8 U 17/12 | 28.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 221/16 | 02.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 SO 974/20 ER | 06.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 150/20 B ER | 31.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 R 1524/18 | 25.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 3741/18 | 14.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 21 R 849/17 | 13.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 4087/18 | 14.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 R 6683/15 | 26.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 1102/18 | 14.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 17 BA 96/16 ER | 14.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 90/19 B ER | 02.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 41 AS 2877/12 | 07.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 352/18 | 27.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 43/19 BH | 13.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. September 2020 |
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 36 AS 1220/18 | 06.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 401/19 | 09.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 BK 10/19 | 01.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 10. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 11 AS 863/19 | 20.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 11 AS 223/19 | 31.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 155/20 NZB | 15.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. September 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 50/19 | 04.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 10. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 48 KR 1921/19 | 18.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 10. September 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 132/19 | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 10. September 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 376 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 376 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 376 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 118/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-118-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-118-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 114/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-114-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-114-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130129 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 162/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-162-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-162-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 2067/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-2067-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-2067-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 152/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-152-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-152-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 4/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-4-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-4-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 255/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-255-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:12:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:12:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-255-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 4463/17 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-4463-17-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-4463-17-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VH 1/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vh-1-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vh-1-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 177/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-177-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-177-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130297 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 566/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-566-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-566-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 221/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-221-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-221-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 150/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-150-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:24:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:24:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-150-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 3741/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-3741-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-3741-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 4087/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-4087-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-4087-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 1102/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-1102-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-1102-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 90/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-90-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-90-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 352/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-352-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-352-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 401/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-401-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-401-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 BK 10/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-bk-10-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-bk-10-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 863/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-863-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-863-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 223/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-223-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-223-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 U 50/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-u-50-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-u-50-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137570 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 KR 1921/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-kr-1921-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-kr-1921-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 U 132/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-u-132-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-u-132-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 118/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-118-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-118-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6914b7e53ea14d2ad962c7305088c3e4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:cca4e02d57cd6386a3dd6673281445c5:0.28550000 1758176175 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.