| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 176/12 | 11.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 16/17 | 23.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 46/19 B | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 38 KR 219/18 | 24.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 1. September 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 27 AS 295/20 ER | 13.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 383/20 B ER | 21.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. September 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 115/16 | 30.07.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 155/18 | 18.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 1. September 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 223 KR 1556/16 | 24.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 308/18 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/20 R (Revision zurückgenommen) | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 31. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 1/18 | 21.08.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 31. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 KR 1091/19 ER | 19.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 598/19 B ER | 23.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 31. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 27 AS 295/20 ER | 13.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 383/20 B ER | 21.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 31. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 181 SO 1298/16 | 07.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 54/18 | 07.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 1/19 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 238/11 | 04.06.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 63/14 | 12.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 2/19 B | 15.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 368/14 | 02.11.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 101/18 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 368/14 | 02.11.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 101/18 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 5 SO 68/16 | 01.12.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 7/17 | 12.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 12/20 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 SO 73/19 ER | 20.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 5/20 B ER | 31.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2020 | |
| - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 21/18 KL | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 101/18 | 29.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 27. August 2020 | ||
| - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 47/19 E | 06.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2020 | |||
| 29.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 18/17 | 15.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 290/20 ER | 24.08.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 27. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 R 447/19 | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 27. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 19 U 153/17 | 27.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 188/18 | 14.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 27. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 3340/18 | 08.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 27. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 27 AS 1992/17 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 2164/18 | 12.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 48 KR 1154/15 | 09.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 466/17 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 42 SF 236/17 E | 12.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 BK 4/20 B | 09.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. August 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 379 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 379 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 379 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 16/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-16-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:13:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:13:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-16-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KR 219/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-kr-219-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-kr-219-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AS 295/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-as-295-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-as-295-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 155/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-155-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-155-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 223 KR 1556/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-223-kr-1556-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-223-kr-1556-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 1/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-1-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-1-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143306 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KR 1091/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-kr-1091-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-kr-1091-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 383/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-383-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-383-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 54/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-54-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:12:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:12:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-54-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 63/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-63-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:10:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:10:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-63-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 101/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-101-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-101-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 101/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-101-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-101-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 7/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-7-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-7-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 5/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-5-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-5-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 21/18 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-21-18-kl-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-21-18-kl-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 101/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-101-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-101-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 47/19 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-47-19-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-47-19-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 18/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-18-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-18-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149306 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 290/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-290-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-290-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 447/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-447-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-447-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 U 153/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-u-153-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-u-153-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 3340/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-3340-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-3340-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 2164/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-2164-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-2164-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 466/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-466-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-466-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BK 4/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-bk-4-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-bk-4-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 16/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-16-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:13:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:13:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-16-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 32b83784d62bd04a6868e7b30bcfe370 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c982e38c36b87444f1561989d1abd46f:0.93128200 1758181521 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.