| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KR 1060/18 | 22.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 669/19 | 24.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 24/22 R | 20.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 AL 16/22 | 29.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 2759/23 | 29.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 EG 2879/22 | 20.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 3069/23 | 23.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 AS 78/22 | 05.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 110/23 ER | 16.02.2024 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 88/24 B ER | 07.05.2024 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 SB 771/22 | 27.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 3164/23 | 26.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 45 AS 152/21 | 30.05.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 12. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 33 AS 90/23 ER | 10.11.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 12. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 U 292/13 | 30.09.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 461/15 | 26.06.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 18 KR 140/24 | 27.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 11. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 KR 193/20 | 16.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 226/22 KH | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 11. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 21 R 627/20 | 19.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 245/22 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 170/23 | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 11. Juli 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 18 R 187/20 | 22.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 339/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 11. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 7 SB 170/22 | 06.02.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 35/23 | 13.06.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 KG 12/21 | 25.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KG 2/22 | 13.05.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 19 SO 104/21 | 28.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 155/22 | 13.07.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 1 U 5001/20 | 25.05.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 178/21 | 07.05.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 AS 483/23 | 28.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2882/23 | 01.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 AS 1924/23 | 09.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 848/24 | 01.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 2 SB 2550/21 | 21.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 284/22 | 27.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 1 R 4067/19 | 07.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 3524/21 | 03.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 4 SB 2787/20 | 07.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3470/22 | 27.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 KR 3594/21 | 19.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1381/23 | 03.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juli 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 R 236/20 | 21.09.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 10. Juli 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 166/17 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 52/19 | 21.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 2/23 R | 06.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 38 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 38 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 38 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 24/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-24-22-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:20:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:20:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-24-22-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 2759/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-2759-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-2759-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 EG 3069/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-eg-3069-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-eg-3069-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AS 78/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-as-78-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-as-78-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 88/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-88-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-88-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 3164/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-3164-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-3164-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 45 AS 152/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-45-as-152-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-45-as-152-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AS 90/23 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-as-90-23-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-as-90-23-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 461/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-461-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-461-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144004 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 140/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-140-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:45:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:45:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-140-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 KR 193/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-kr-193-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-kr-193-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 R 627/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-r-627-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-r-627-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140365 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 R 187/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-r-187-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-r-187-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 35/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-35-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-35-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KG 2/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kg-2-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kg-2-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 155/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-155-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-155-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 178/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-178-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-178-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2882/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2882-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2882-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 848/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-848-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-848-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 284/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-284-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-284-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160668 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 3524/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-3524-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-3524-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3470/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3470-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3470-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1381/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1381-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1381-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 236/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-236-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-236-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 2/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-2-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:20:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:20:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-2-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 24/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-24-22-r-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:20:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:20:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-24-22-r-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f2e453bb76f0d5e6dac10784370ab228 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:db8816b729a071727360b0fc725da54e:0.30636000 1745188203 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.