| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 AS 1626/19 | 02.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1772/19 | 23.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 15 U 5041/19 | 14.08.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 26. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 26/15 | 20.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 26. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 1264/19 | 18.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 26. August 2020 | ||
| - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 SF 90/20 AB | 29.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 25. August 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 AS 3735/14 | 14.06.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 SF 89/20 AB | 29.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 25. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 4 AS 4354/14 | 03.08.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 60/18 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 25. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 26 AL 28/18 | 08.11.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 15/20 NZB | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 25. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 25 AS 155/19 ER | 06.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 25. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 4 RS 7/16 | 15.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 398/18 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 24. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 AS 1494/11 | 18.11.2011 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 2309/11 | 16.10.2012 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 18 U 488/18 | 12.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 534/19 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 111/20 B | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 29 AL 231/17 | 27.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 931/19 | 06.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 112/19 | 16.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 61 R 2015/16 | 17.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 24. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 15 R 1223/15 | 13.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 R 101/18 | 15.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 32 AS 4159/15 | 15.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 38/18 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 15 R 302/15 | 13.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 R 93/18 | 01.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 24 AS 4025/14 | 06.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 79/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 24 AS 3251/18 | 07.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 80/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 24 AS 3251/18 | 07.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 80/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 24 AS 663/16 | 06.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 268/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 24 AS 1686/17 | 26.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 291/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 22 AS 1950/13 | 28.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 328/19 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 26 AS 2870/14 | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 332/17 | 19.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 380 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 380 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 380 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1772/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1772-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1772-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 U 5041/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-u-5041-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-u-5041-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 26/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-26-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-26-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 1264/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-1264-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-1264-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 90/20 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-90-20-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-90-20-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 89/20 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-89-20-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-89-20-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 60/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-60-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-60-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 15/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-15-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-15-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 AS 155/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-as-155-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-as-155-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161543 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 398/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-398-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-398-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2309/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2309-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2309-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 534/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-534-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-534-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 931/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-931-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-931-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 112/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-112-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-112-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137485 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 61 R 2015/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-61-r-2015-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-61-r-2015-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 101/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-101-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-101-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 38/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-38-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-38-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 93/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-93-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-93-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 79/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-79-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-79-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 80/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-80-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-80-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159055 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 80/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-80-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-80-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 268/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-268-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-268-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 291/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-291-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-291-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 328/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-328-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-328-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159039 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 332/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-332-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-332-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1772/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1772-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1772-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cfd21e8ef92f96694240a43a3f5cd244 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:557ce9c07fc20224025ac1a23922aa82:0.81559800 1758187517 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.