| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 7 SO 660/16 | 14.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 7/19 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 AS 1015/20 ER | 16.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 1376/20 ER-B | 07.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 50 SO 1912/17 | 04.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 95/19 NZB | 29.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 29 AS 2651/17 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1879/19 B | 29.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 R 2788/17 | 08.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 97/19 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 404/15 | 16.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 212/17 | 04.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 9 R 892/16 | 26.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 R 714/17 | 02.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 136/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 4427/15 | 17.07.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1044/18 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 20. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 460/17 | 29.10.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1556/18 | 04.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 20. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 28 AS 1665/14 | 24.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 869/17 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 127/19 | 18.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 20. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 132/19 | 18.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 20. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 AY 18/19 | 18.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 20. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 32 AS 3072/19 ER | 30.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 20. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 KR 306/18 | 06.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 20. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 8 AS 659/15 | 30.09.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 773/15 | 19.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. August 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 133/20 EK AS WA | 30.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2020 | |||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 133/20 EK AS WA | 30.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 60 AL 980/14 | 11.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 45/16 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 649/19 | 17.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 530/20 B PKH | 08.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 649/19 | 17.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 530/20 B PKH | 08.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 R 409/14 | 07.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 10/18 | 22.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 19. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 R 1230/17 ER | 21.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 847/17 B ER | 12.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 19. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 25/99 | 06.12.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 19. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 4462/19 | 13.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 18. August 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 381 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 381 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 381 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9500, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1376/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1376-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:10:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:10:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1376-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 95/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-95-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-95-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126683 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1879/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1879-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1879-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 97/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-97-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-97-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 212/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-212-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-212-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 714/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-714-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-714-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1044/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1044-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1044-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1556/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1556-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1556-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145834 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 869/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-869-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-869-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 127/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-127-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-127-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 132/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-132-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-132-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AY 18/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ay-18-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ay-18-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AS 3072/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-as-3072-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-as-3072-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134742 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 KR 306/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-kr-306-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-kr-306-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129269 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 773/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-773-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-773-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 133/20 EK AS WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-133-20-ek-as-wa-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-133-20-ek-as-wa-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 133/20 EK AS WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-133-20-ek-as-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-133-20-ek-as-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 45/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-45-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-45-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 530/20 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-530-20-b-pkh-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-530-20-b-pkh-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 530/20 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-530-20-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-530-20-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 10/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-10-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-10-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 847/17 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-847-17-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-847-17-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 25/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-25-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-25-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 4462/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-4462-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-4462-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 159035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:03:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:03:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0a97f8617abd7bbef71e7781cbe5fe77 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0a8f733fc07624a21ccd6f5733e11f18:0.18712600 1758187518 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.