| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 2 EG 19/19 | 22.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 EG 3/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 18. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 119 SB 1755/16 | 17.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 32/19 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 10 U 236/14 | 29.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 103/17 | 14.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 7 AS 523/15 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 745/17 NZB | 27.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 720/14 | 16.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 642/16 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 25 KR 579/15 | 05.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 20/17 | 21.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 14/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 41 AS 708/16 | 03.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1285/18 | 29.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 5 AS 143/18 | 20.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1240/18 | 29.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 4 AS 454/19 ER | 11.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 34 U 67/15 | 16.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 17. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 9 EG 1/17 | 06.07.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 36/18 | 26.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 99 AS 22900/15 | 15.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 1703/18 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 61/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 44 AS 418/14 | 06.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 2045/16 | 06.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 12/19 B | 14.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. August 2020 |
| S 16 AS 495/19 ER | 17.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 267/19 B ER | 26.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 6 BA 1/20 ER | 04.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 5/20 B ER | 11.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 12 R 269/17 | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 266/19 | 26.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 11 R 1475/16 | 14.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 358/19 | 25.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 10 R 137/16 | 16.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 1807/18 | 30.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 1898/14 | 20.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 BA 2513/19 | 10.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 R 3020/16 | 11.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 BA 3646/18 | 20.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 SO 208/19 | 28.04.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 139/20 NZB | 13.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 11 BL 1/13 | 30.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 2/17 | 28.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 36 U 368/14 | 09.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 725/17 ZVW | 13.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/20 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 388/18 | 08.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 18 U 72/18 | 12.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 533/19 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 13. August 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 382 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 382 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 382 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150091 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 EG 19/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-eg-19-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-eg-19-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 32/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-32-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-32-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161553 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 103/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-103-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-103-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161548 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 745/17 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-745-17-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-745-17-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 642/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-642-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-642-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 20/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-20-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-20-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145569 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1285/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1285-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1285-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1240/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1240-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1240-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AS 454/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-as-454-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-as-454-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 U 67/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-u-67-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-u-67-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 36/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-36-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-36-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 1703/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-1703-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:23:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:23:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-1703-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 2045/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-2045-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:09:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:09:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-2045-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 267/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-267-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-267-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 5/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-5-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-5-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 266/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-266-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:43:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:43:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-266-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 358/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-358-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-358-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 1807/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-1807-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-1807-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 2513/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-2513-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-2513-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 3646/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-3646-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-3646-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SO 139/20 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-so-139-20-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-so-139-20-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 2/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-2-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-2-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 725/17 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-725-17-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:09:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:09:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-725-17-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 388/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-388-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-388-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 72/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-72-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-72-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150091 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 EG 19/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-eg-19-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-eg-19-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 10a3d75188d2554228fd033aea196498 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3b61c853bf7e85f27f41b49e5678abd9:0.40331400 1758193434 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.