Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 12 SB 566/18 | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 10. August 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 566/19 | 17.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 10. August 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 73/18 | 23.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 10. August 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AS 1244/17 | 22.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 1936/19 | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 44 AS 1546/17 | 07.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1426/19 | 25.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 58/20 R | 05.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. August 2020 |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 18 U 72/18 | 12.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 533/19 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 110/20 B | 21.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. August 2020 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 1451/17 | 12.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 274/18 B | 03.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 7. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 32/19 | 17.07.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 7. August 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 1451/17 | 12.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 274/18 B | 03.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 7. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 21 KR 123/16 | 14.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 56/17 | 31.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 4/19 R | 07.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. August 2020 |
Sozialgericht Bremen | S 31 R 100/15 | 24.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2/12 R 221/16 | 20.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 6/18 R | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. August 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 R 2245/16 | 05.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 264/18 | 12.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 1/19 R | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. August 2020 |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 1522/18 | 23.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3313/18 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 SB 3784/16 | 11.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 3970/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 AL 862/19 | 14.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 3185/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 4 U 847/18 | 01.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 3944/18 | 15.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 158/19 | 29.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 6. August 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 VG 56/17 | 12.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 3/20 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 67 P 193/16 | 12.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 147/19 | 26.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 3 AS 4917/16 | 02.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 477/17 | 14.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 R 152/15 | 19.11.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 42/19 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 102/16 | 04.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 151/17 | 30.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 244/16 | 10.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 292/19 | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 123/16 | 17.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 150/19 | 03.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 6. August 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 1083/18 | 27.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 6. August 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 384 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 384 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 384 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 566/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-566-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-566-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 566/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-566-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-566-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 73/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-73-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-73-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1936/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1936-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1936-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1426/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1426-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1426-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 533/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-533-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-533-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 1451/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-1451-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-1451-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133667 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 32/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-32-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-32-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 274/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-274-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-274-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87452 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 4/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-4-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-4-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 6/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-6-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-6-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87330 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RS 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rs-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rs-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3313/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3313-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3313-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 3970/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-3970-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-3970-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 3185/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-3185-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-3185-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 3944/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-3944-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-3944-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150086 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 158/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-158-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-158-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 3/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-3-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-3-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 147/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-147-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-147-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 477/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-477-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-477-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 152/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-152-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-152-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 102/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-102-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-102-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 244/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-244-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-244-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 123/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-123-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-123-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 1083/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-1083-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-1083-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 566/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-566-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-566-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1a8d3f7c726f4b4718faf5819587e526 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:697e33f21bc9f8b6fe627966ab0b5002:0.57118200 1758199340 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.