| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 96/16 WA | 02.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 6. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 126/15 WA | 15.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 6. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 148/15 WA | 11.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 6. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 113/17 | 18.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 6. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 279/17 | 15.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 6. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 123/16 | 17.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 150/19 | 03.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 6. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 14 KR 154/19 | 31.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 247/20 | 16.03.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 815/17 | 17.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 98/18 | 25.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 59/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 199/17 | 17.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 3467/18 | 22.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 AL 3727/17 | 26.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 3052/19 | 22.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 22 R 1474/15 | 09.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 289/17 | 27.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 314/16 | 25.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 638/18 | 23.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 4. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 15 KR 639/15 | 26.04.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 309/19 | 06.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 4. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 29 R 1494/13 | 19.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 1097/15 | 03.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 4. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 562/17 | 29.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 663/18 | 31.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 56/19 B | 01.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 4. August 2020 |
| - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SF 24/17 EK KR | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 1/20 R | 16.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 4. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 R 213/17 | 12.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 324/18 | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 27/20 B | 24.06.2020 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 3. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 7 KR 396/17 | 06.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 101/19 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 3. August 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 3 SB 522/14 | 06.06.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 69/17 | 20.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 67/19 B | 27.05.2020 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 3. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 54 AS 2828/19 ER | 20.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 3. August 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 R 213/17 | 12.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 324/18 | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 27/20 B | 24.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 3. August 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5/18 | 17.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 31. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5/18 | 17.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 31. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 KR 1271/18 | 10.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 31. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 2557/19 ER | 20.12.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 31. Juli 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 385 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 385 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 385 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 96/16 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-96-16-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-96-16-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 126/15 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-126-15-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-126-15-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 148/15 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-148-15-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-148-15-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 113/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-113-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-113-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133533 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 279/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-279-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-279-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 150/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-150-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-150-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 154/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-154-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-154-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 98/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-98-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-98-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3467/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3467-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3467-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 3052/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-3052-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-3052-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 289/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-289-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-289-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 314/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-314-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-314-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 639/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-639-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-639-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 R 1494/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-r-1494-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-r-1494-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 663/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-663-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-663-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SF 24/17 EK KR [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sf-24-17-ek-kr [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sf-24-17-ek-kr/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 213/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-213-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-213-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 101/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-101-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-101-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SB 522/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-sb-522-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-sb-522-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 54 AS 2828/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-54-as-2828-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-54-as-2828-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130094 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 324/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-324-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-324-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 KR 1271/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-kr-1271-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-kr-1271-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 2557/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-2557-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-2557-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-08-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KR 96/16 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kr-96-16-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kr-96-16-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e444d43d582e5247c8df9d1630081814 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9d27cbe7e1a64e2fc241658fa8c37fa2:0.46293700 1758199340 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.