| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 R 985/13 | 19.05.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 BA 27/18 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 2/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 190/16 | 14.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 340/18 | 24.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 8 AS 1050/14 | 30.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 484/16 | 17.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 30 AS 1260/12 | 26.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 245/16 | 17.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 96/19 | 06.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 28. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 16 AS 618/14 (SG Schleswig) | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 17/20 WA | 28.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 R 1771/15 | 16.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 278/17 | 05.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 575/15 | 21.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1948/19 | 23.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 988/16 | 08.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 264/17 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 1 KR 323/11 (SG Lübeck) | 18.09.2012 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 123/15 ZVW | 25.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 823/16, S 12 KA 139/17, S 12 KA 140/17 | 23.11.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 10/20, L 4 KA 11/20, L 4 KA 12/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 27. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 15 BA 15/19 ER | 06.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 118/19 B ER | 15.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juli 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 SF 390/19 AB, u.a. | 02.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juli 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 U 886/12 | 07.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 751/16 | 05.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 141/20 B | 08.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 KR 155/98 | 18.02.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 74/99 | 20.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 27. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 22 SO 101/13 | 24.02.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 1837/15 | 03.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 24. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 An 89/95 | 13.08.1997 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 RA 39/97 | 06.06.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 RA 102/00 R | 24.07.2001 | Sozialgericht Köln | 24. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 301/16 | 02.10.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 1/19 | 12.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 14 R 282/18 | 09.08.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 436/19 | 01.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 279/20 ER | 20.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 23. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 R 938/17 | 29.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 23. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 3 VE 9/14 | 04.10.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 26/17 | 27.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 46/18 B | 09.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 3 SB 522/14 | 06.06.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 69/17 | 20.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 67/19 B | 27.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 29 R 520/16 | 01.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 245/17 | 06.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 36/17 R | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 26 U 369/12 | 07.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 221/17 | 06.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juli 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 388 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 388 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 388 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 27/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-27-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-27-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 340/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-340-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-340-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 484/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-484-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:36:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:36:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-484-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 245/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-245-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-245-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 17/20 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-17-20-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-17-20-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 278/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-278-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-278-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1948/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1948-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1948-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 264/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-264-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-264-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 123/15 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-123-15-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-123-15-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 823/16, S 12 KA 139/17, S 12 KA 140/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-823-16-s-12-ka-139-17-s-12-ka-140-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:40:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:40:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-823-16-s-12-ka-139-17-s-12-ka-140-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 118/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-118-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-118-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145744 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 SF 390/19 AB, u.a. [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-sf-390-19-ab-u-a [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-sf-390-19-ab-u-a/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 751/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-751-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:06:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:06:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-751-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 155/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-155-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-155-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 SO 101/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-so-101-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-so-101-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 1837/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-1837-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-1837-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 An 89/95 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-an-89-95 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-an-89-95/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 1/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-1-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-1-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 436/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-436-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-436-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 279/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-279-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-279-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 R 938/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-r-938-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-r-938-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130085 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 VE 26/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ve-26-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ve-26-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 69/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-69-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-69-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87329 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 36/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-36-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-36-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145740 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 221/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-221-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:08:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:08:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-221-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 27/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-27-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-27-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 143df330b357e6950dbd0320577dff08 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5d9192b267c35008291ed3752b7cd498:0.97548500 1758223225 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.