| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 6/05 ER | 17.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 390/15 | 04.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 AS 3914/15 durch gerichtlichen Vergleich vom | 26.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 12 AS 449/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 20. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 31 R 1340/17 | 15.03.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 P 1068/18 | 10.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 40 KR 672/15 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 3 AL 164/18 | 03.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 60/19 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 20. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 171/17 | 14.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 221/18 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 24/20 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 20. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 R 360/11 | 26.02.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 152/13 | 26.02.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 9/16 R | 14.12.2016 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 20. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 232/16 | 08.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 5/19 | 19.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 20. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 139/17 | 08.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 67 AS 2641/19 ER | 08.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 334/16 | 21.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 39 AS 4251/14 | 10.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 AL 187/18 | 29.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 68/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 20. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 5 AS 565/19 | 15.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 13 KR 1086/16 | 04.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 20. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 12 SO 297/17 | 21.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 KR 161/18 | 23.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 6 AS 672/18 ER | 16.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1045/18 B ER | 08.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 20. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 720/19 WA | 09.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 23 U 67/18 | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 R 557/18 | 18.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Stuttgart | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 2 KR 18/17 | 29.01.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 20 R 462/17 | 14.05.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 20. Juli 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 390 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 390 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 390 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 6/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-6-05-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-6-05-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 U 390/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-u-390-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:55:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:55:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-u-390-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 3914/15 durch gerichtlichen Vergleich vom [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-3914-15-durch-gerichtlichen-vergleich-vom [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-3914-15-durch-gerichtlichen-vergleich-vom/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 1340/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-1340-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:34:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:34:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-1340-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 P 1068/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-p-1068-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:12:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:12:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-p-1068-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 KR 672/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-kr-672-15-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:11:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:11:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-kr-672-15-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 164/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-164-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-164-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 171/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-171-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-171-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 360/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-360-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-360-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 U 232/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-u-232-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-u-232-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 139/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-139-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-139-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 67 AS 2641/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-67-as-2641-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-67-as-2641-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137213 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 36 U 334/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-36-u-334-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-36-u-334-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136825 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 AS 4251/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-as-4251-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-as-4251-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AL 187/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-al-187-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-al-187-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 565/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-565-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-565-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134434 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 1086/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-1086-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-1086-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 297/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-297-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-297-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 161/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-161-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-161-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 672/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-672-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-672-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AS 720/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-as-720-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-as-720-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 67/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-67-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-67-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 557/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-557-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:06:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:06:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-557-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132094 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 18/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-18-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-18-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 R 462/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-r-462-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-r-462-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 6/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-6-05-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-6-05-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c059ec1a1f9015aaf8b9d9b31ce29d0a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2c6cba522f7f7cbd0aa19a30e8217398:0.09227900 1758223542 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.