| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 5 KR 1364/14 | 14.03.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 14 R 932/15 | 12.01.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 R 1629/16 | 21.11.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 3 EG 870/15 | 01.09.2015 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 AS 1991/18 | 18.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 564/11 | 03.12.2013 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 78/14 | 31.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 19/18 B | - | Sozialgericht Cottbus | 20. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 14 KR 3166/18 | 22.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 7 U 98/11 | 13.06.2013 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Schleswig | 20. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 171/17 | 14.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 221/18 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 24/20 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 KR 3927/16 | 24.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4149/18 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| S 5 KR 598/19 | 08.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2612/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 14 R 3148/17 | 16.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 3926/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 1016/18 | 16.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2883/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 1120/17 | 10.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2653/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 4108/18 | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3937/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 R 1295/17 | 17.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 2873/19 | 16.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 10 U 2373/17 | 24.09.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1340/19 | 04.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 122/20 | 30.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 15 SO 37/17 (SG Itzehoe) | 03.08.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 48/18 | 04.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 19 KR 279/20 ER | 19.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 150/20 B ER | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 22 SO 344/17 | 29.03.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 511/17 | 19.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 53 AS 4828/19 | 21.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 17. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 8 R 107/18 | 26.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 671/18 | 20.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 9 P 113/17 | 05.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 27/18 | 13.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 391 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 391 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 391 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 1364/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-1364-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-1364-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131830 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 932/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-932-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-932-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 1629/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-1629-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-1629-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131359 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 EG 870/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-eg-870-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-eg-870-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131314 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 1991/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-1991-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-1991-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131270 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 R 564/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-r-564-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-r-564-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 3166/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-3166-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-3166-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 98/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-98-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:51:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:51:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-98-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 221/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-221-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-221-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 4149/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-4149-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-4149-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2612/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2612-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2612-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 3926/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-3926-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-3926-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154086 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2883/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2883-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2883-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2653/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2653-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2653-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3937/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3937-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:09:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:09:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3937-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 2873/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-2873-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-2873-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1340/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1340-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1340-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 122/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-122-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-122-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 48/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-48-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-48-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KR 279/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-kr-279-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-kr-279-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 SO 344/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-so-344-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-so-344-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 511/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-511-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-511-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137479 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 53 AS 4828/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-53-as-4828-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-53-as-4828-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 671/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-671-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-671-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 27/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-27-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-27-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 1364/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-1364-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-1364-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e16d6d56818e0851ad505f24f9f850ee [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3ac01e46dec201c5d97b0a6709404ede:0.85710700 1758217719 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.