| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 2115/16 | 30.11.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 8/18 | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 2111/16 | 30.11.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 6/18 | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Juli 2020 | |
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 73/20 | 25.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 16. Juli 2020 | |||
| S 9 U 1526/17 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 459/19 B | 18.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 16. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 38 KR 127/18 | 24.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 16. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 30 KR 1024/20 ER | 14.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 16. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 R 20/13 | 10.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 8/18 | 09.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 16. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 2353/14 | 07.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 16. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 R 396/20 | 08.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 16. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 16 SB 184/20 | 14.07.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Chemnitz | 16. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 U 5002/17 L | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 330/18 | 06.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 66 AS 24139/15 | 28.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 1928/17 | 31.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 17/19 R | 20.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 AY 40/19 ER | 08.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 4/20 B ER | 23.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 54 AY 18/12 | 25.02.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 4/14 | 07.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AY 3/20 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 51/12 | 09.03.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 80/15 | 26.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 4 R 504/17 | 15.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 3832/19 | 17.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 R 655/18 | 12.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 2808/19 | 12.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 KR 4257/18 | 25.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1611/19 | 12.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 R 1964/19 | 04.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 3900/19 | 12.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 44 R 306/18 | 03.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 847/19 | 10.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 19 AY 31/18 | 27.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AY 40/19 | 08.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 15. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 301/17 | 17.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 507/19 ER | 29.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 12 KR 1865/18 | 25.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 1719/19 | 17.06.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Juli 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 392 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 392 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 392 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 8/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-8-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-8-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130086 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 6/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-6-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-6-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 73/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-73-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-73-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 459/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-459-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-459-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KR 127/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-kr-127-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-kr-127-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137564 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 KR 1024/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-kr-1024-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-kr-1024-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 R 20/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-r-20-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-r-20-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 2353/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-2353-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-2353-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 396/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-396-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-396-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131862 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => 16 SB 184/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => 16-sb-184-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/16-sb-184-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 330/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-330-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-330-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 17/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-17-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-17-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 4/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-4-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-4-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160383 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 4/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-4-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-4-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 80/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-80-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-80-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 3832/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-3832-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-3832-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 2808/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-2808-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-2808-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1611/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1611-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1611-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 3900/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-3900-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-3900-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 847/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-847-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-847-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145629 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AY 40/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-ay-40-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-ay-40-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 301/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-301-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-301-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 507/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-507-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-507-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 1865/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-1865-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-1865-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 1719/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-1719-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-1719-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 8/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-8-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-8-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 952c770ad858a883e24bb2753e63f3d7 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f20fff6a023a5b05bc1fea1438f9421e:0.98544100 1758223210 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.