| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 303/15 KL | 24.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 16/18 R | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 KR 589/16 | 16.10.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 761/17 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RS 419/17 | 10.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 558/19 ZV | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 39 R 1028/13 | 13.03.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 334/15 | 22.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 50 AS 898/17 | 25.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 712/20 | 02.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 36 AS 1939/16 | 01.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 833/17 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 34 U 67/15 | 16.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 55/16 | 21.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 7/20 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 BA 54/19 ER | 02.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 194/19 B ER | 06.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 5 AS 361/20 ER | 17.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 13. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 40 AS 644/16 | 27.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 13. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 685/20 ER | 30.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 13. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 32 AY 47/19 ER | 26.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 13. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 684/20 ER | 30.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 13. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 10 SB 1626/17 | 07.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 SB 363/18 und L 1 SF 155/19 AB | 18.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 14/20 B | 01.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 8 KR 2/15 | 03.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 36/19 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. Juli 2020 | |
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SF 178/20 EK PKH | 07.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 675/16 | 30.10.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 544/18 | 05.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 KA 600/19 WA | 17.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 15/20 B | 17.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 R 2238/19 ER | 02.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 R 728/19 B ER | 07.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 42 SB 1646/19 | 12.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 62/20 B PKH | 20.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Juli 2020 | |
| S 23 R 2077/19 ER | 23.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 R 735/19 B ER | 23.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 165 SF 604/17 E | 09.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 39 SF 219/17 B E | 22.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 31 KR 21/14 | 08.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 659/16 | 23.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 10/19 R | 26.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 U 192/13 | 25.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 448/17 | 13.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 2/18 R | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 13 U 201/12 | 19.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 4847/16 | 30.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 3/18 R | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 10. Juli 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 394 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 394 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 394 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 16/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-16-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-16-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 761/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-761-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-761-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 558/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-558-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-558-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160371 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 334/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-334-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:21:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:21:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-334-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 712/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-712-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-712-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 833/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-833-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-833-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 55/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-55-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-55-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 194/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-194-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-194-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 361/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-361-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-361-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 AS 644/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-as-644-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-as-644-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AS 685/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-as-685-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-as-685-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AY 47/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-ay-47-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-ay-47-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AS 684/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-as-684-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-as-684-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SB 363/18 und L 1 SF 155/19 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sb-363-18-und-l-1-sf-155-19-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sb-363-18-und-l-1-sf-155-19-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 2/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-2-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-2-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SF 178/20 EK PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sf-178-20-ek-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sf-178-20-ek-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130269 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 544/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-544-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-544-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 15/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-15-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-15-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 R 728/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-r-728-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-r-728-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 62/20 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-62-20-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-62-20-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 R 735/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-r-735-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-r-735-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 39 SF 219/17 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-39-sf-219-17-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-39-sf-219-17-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87447 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 10/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-10-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:01:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:01:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-10-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 2/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-2-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:00:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:00:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-2-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87410 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 3/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-3-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:00:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:00:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-3-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 16/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-16-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-16-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e23883c6e2ce84b24d21578e450a8047 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b67583e653d1f54205a626ffcd5cb5e2:0.37039500 1758228913 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.