| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 1085/15 | 05.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Juli 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 44 BA 143/19 ER | 13.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 27/20 B ER | 29.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 44 BA 54/19 ER | 17.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 139/19 B ER | 15.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 AS 2233/15 | 09.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1298/18 | 04.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 30 SO 323/11 WA | 14.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 3 AS 431/18 | 27.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 28 SO 229/14 | 17.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 KN 947/17 | 15.11.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 7 SF 197/16 E | 23.04.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 AS 280/20 | 03.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 AS 2296/18 | 17.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 AS 3170/16 | 20.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Juli 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 13 R 888/15 | 27.06.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 457/18 | 01.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 27 R 797/16 | 21.07.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 5129/17 | 21.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 103 AS 8936/19 | 16.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 AS 197/20 B PKH | 26.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 144 AS 2590/18 | 14.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 AS 1097/18 NZB | 12.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Juli 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 1418/20 | 12.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 1328/20 | 18.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 13 U 4219/16 | 29.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 289/18 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 3 SF 5536/16 E | 24.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 3796/18 E-B | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 U 3581/17 | 20.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 4485/18 | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 BA 2351/18 | 28.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 BA 1483/19 | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 SF 3292/17 E | 12.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 4170/18 E-B | 09.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 12 U 1746/17 | 29.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2537/18 | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 R 500/15 | 23.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1177/16 | 30.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juli 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 395 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 395 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 395 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 9850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1085/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1085-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1085-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145647 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 27/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-27-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-27-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145643 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 139/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-139-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-139-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145638 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1298/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1298-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1298-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SO 323/11 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-so-323-11-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-so-323-11-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 431/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-431-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-431-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 SO 229/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-so-229-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-so-229-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 KN 947/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-kn-947-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-kn-947-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136316 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SF 197/16 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-sf-197-16-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:38:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:38:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-sf-197-16-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 280/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-280-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-280-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 2296/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-2296-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-2296-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 3170/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-3170-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-3170-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130267 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 457/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-457-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:00:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:00:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-457-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 R 5129/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-r-5129-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-r-5129-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 197/20 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-197-20-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-197-20-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126584 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 1097/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-1097-18-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-1097-18-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 1418/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-1418-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-1418-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154030 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 1328/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-1328-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-1328-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 289/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-289-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-289-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154021 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 3796/18 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-3796-18-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-3796-18-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 4485/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-4485-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-4485-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 1483/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-1483-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-1483-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154009 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 4170/18 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-4170-18-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-4170-18-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2537/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2537-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2537-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 154002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1177/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1177-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:08:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:08:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1177-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-07-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-07-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 1085/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-1085-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:07:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:07:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-1085-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 02b584f8bdab5bc8f9e1873bee527483 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c8577f9936d380b4694153b05c8bb6d8:0.06036700 1758228918 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.