| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 78 KA 311/13 | 16.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 14/20 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 10. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 9 U 218/21 | 18.05.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 217/22 | 10.05.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 1759/22 | 28.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 2698/23 | 09.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 282/24 | 20.11.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 AL 2084/24 ER | 19.08.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 187 AS 558/21 | 23.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 300/23 | 22.08.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 22/24 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 128 AS 5181/23 | 26.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 1051/23 B ER | 15.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 176 R 1204/22 | 30.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 R 222/23 NZB | 13.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 379/19 | 11.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 85/21 | 09.11.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 27/24 B | 05.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 37 AS 1597/19 | 05.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 1438/21 | 15.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 180 SF 233/22 E | 11.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 39 SF 52/23 B E | 30.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 13 VE 2/18 | 30.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VE 52/21 | 14.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 SF 227/24 AB | 21.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 AS 1839/23 | 28.08.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2865/24 | 29.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 1 U 308/21 | 23.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 2750/22 | 29.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 21 BA 2761/20 | 25.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 1572/23 | 19.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 12 KR 2060/18 | 09.01.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 799/23 | 25.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 KR 3743/20 | 09.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 709/22 | 25.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 R 504/23 | 18.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 95/24 | 25.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 R 1233/24 | 27.06.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2045/24 | 21.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 72 R 1976/19 | 20.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 678/22 | 21.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 24 R 632/21 | 21.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 133/22 | 12.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 18 R 232/19 | 20.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 531/24 B | 28.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 15 P 6/17 | 24.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 139/21 | 10.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 1120/18 | 24.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 172/22 | 07.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 4 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 4 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 4 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 75, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 217/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-217-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-217-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 2698/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-2698-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-2698-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 282/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-282-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:46:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:46:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-282-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AL 2084/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-al-2084-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:13:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:13:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-al-2084-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 300/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-300-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-300-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 1051/23 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-1051-23-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-1051-23-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 R 222/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-r-222-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-r-222-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 85/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-85-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-85-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 1438/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-1438-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-1438-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 39 SF 52/23 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-39-sf-52-23-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-39-sf-52-23-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VE 52/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-ve-52-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-ve-52-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129826 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 SF 227/24 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-sf-227-24-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-sf-227-24-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2865/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2865-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2865-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 2750/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-2750-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-2750-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 1572/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-1572-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-1572-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 799/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-799-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-799-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 709/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-709-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-709-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 95/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-95-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-95-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161187 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2045/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2045-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2045-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 678/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-678-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:02:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:02:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-678-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151030 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 133/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-133-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:02:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:02:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-133-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 531/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-531-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:02:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:02:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-531-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 139/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-139-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-139-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 172/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-172-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-172-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-14-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-14-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 12bdf0c35342ad6bf6a7cc55cbc82876 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.