Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 KR 10/22 | 23.02.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 265/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 3. Juli 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 21 KR 342/22 | 18.04.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 287/23 | 13.05.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 3. Juli 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 1 R 499/20 | 14.12.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 40/24 AR | 27.05.2024 | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 3. Juli 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 19 P 160/23 | 11.12.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 P 1/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 3. Juli 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 U 1879/23 | 18.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 3. Juli 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 R 1807/22 | 05.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 2967/23 | 16.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Juli 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 VG 389/20 | 20.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 2976/23 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Juli 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 4 VS 2169/22 | 07.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VS 2608/23 | 21.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. Juli 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 KR 589/22 | 13.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 82/24 | 19.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 244/20 | 20.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3580/21 | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 U 277/23 | 16.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 327/24 | 17.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 169/23 | 16.08.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 3280/23 | 12.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 R 738/21 | 21.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 2489/22 | 09.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 EG 1/22 | 25.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 EG 1/18 | 25.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 SO 2208/23 | 26.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 28. Juni 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 KR 2264/23 | 14.06.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 28. Juni 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 78 AS 81/22 | 05.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 44/24 | 13.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 78 AS 2783/21 | 05.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 43/24 | 13.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 BA 16/21 | 23.05.2022 | L 3 BA 20/22 | 14.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 27. Juni 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 198/14 | 18.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 25/21 | 06.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 497/20 | 11.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 27. Juni 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 497/20 | 11.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 27. Juni 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 18/19 | 27.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 247/22 | 02.05.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 18/19 | 27.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 247/22 | 02.05.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 27. Juni 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 40 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 40 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 40 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 10/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-10-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-10-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 342/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-342-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-342-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 R 499/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-r-499-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-r-499-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 P 160/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-p-160-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-p-160-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 1879/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-1879-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-1879-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 2967/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-2967-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-2967-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 2976/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-2976-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-2976-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160636 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VS 2608/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vs-2608-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vs-2608-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 82/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-82-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:25:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:25:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-82-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160630 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3580/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3580-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3580-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160627 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 327/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-327-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-327-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3280/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3280-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3280-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2489/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2489-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2489-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 EG 1/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-eg-1-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-eg-1-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 EG 1/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-eg-1-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-eg-1-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SO 2208/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-so-2208-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-so-2208-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 2264/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-2264-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-2264-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 44/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-44-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-44-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 43/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-43-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-43-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 20/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-20-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-20-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 25/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-25-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-25-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 497/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-497-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-497-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 497/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-497-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-497-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 18/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-18-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-18-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 247/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-247-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-247-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-07-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-07-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 10/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-10-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-10-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => aac4a8eb8003a121d945c53e9951658f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c9e9550bd68becb56f077dd4a3a6a5a7:0.83108300 1745217417 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.