| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 R 2046/13 | 18.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 851/18 | 14.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 BA 106/18 | 19.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 24. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 25 KR 363/18 | 04.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 24. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 41 AS 3277/19 | 11.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 24. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 3 AS 2075/08 ER | 15.09.2008 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 B 415/08 AS ER | 18.12.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 24. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 EG 3/00 | 18.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 EG 17/01 | 24.10.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 24. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 15 SO 104/16 | 12.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SO 17/19 NZB | 04.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 50 R 1648/15 | 01.06.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 425/17 | 24.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 14/18 R | 16.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 R 2395/12 | 15.09.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 R 883/14 | 12.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 7/18 R | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 45 BA 58/19 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 237/19 B ER | 06.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 504/15 | 08.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 676/16 | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 37/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 49 KR 45/16 | 12.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 723/17 | 08.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 29/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 U 171/18 | 08.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 668/19 | 26.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 108/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 599/14 | 13.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 12/19 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 19/20 B | 26.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 AS 992/18 | 09.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1603/19 | 23.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 238/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 66/13 | 16.07.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 397/19 | 16.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 11/20 R | 08.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 1 KO 1232/20 | 30.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 23. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 VG 60/13 | 18.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 23. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 KA 40/98 | 21.04.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 106/99 | 12.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 23. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 KA 40/98 | 21.04.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 106/99 | 12.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 23. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 R 1962/12 ER | 08.04.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 499/13 B ER | 23.12.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 23. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 KR 233/05 | 20.12.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 23. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 28 KR 67/02 | 07.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 23. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 8 RJ 9/00 | 27.11.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 23. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 47 AS 3219/18 ER | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 365/19 B ER | 28.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 23. Juni 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 401 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 401 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 401 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145261 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 851/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-851-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-851-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 BA 106/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ba-106-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ba-106-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137558 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 363/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-363-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-363-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 3277/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-3277-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-3277-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133239 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 2075/08 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-2075-08-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-2075-08-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 EG 3/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-eg-3-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-eg-3-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SO 17/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-so-17-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-so-17-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 14/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-14-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-14-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 7/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-7-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-7-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 237/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-237-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-237-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 676/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-676-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-676-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 723/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-723-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:05:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:05:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-723-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 668/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-668-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-668-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145351 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 12/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-12-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-12-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1603/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1603-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1603-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145086 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 SO 397/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-so-397-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:02:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:02:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-so-397-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KO 1232/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ko-1232-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ko-1232-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 VG 60/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-vg-60-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-vg-60-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KA 40/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ka-40-98-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ka-40-98-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KA 40/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ka-40-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ka-40-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 R 1962/12 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-r-1962-12-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-r-1962-12-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134669 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KR 233/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-kr-233-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-kr-233-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 67/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-67-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-67-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RJ 9/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-rj-9-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-rj-9-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 AS 3219/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-as-3219-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-as-3219-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145261 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 851/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-851-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-851-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => be408531987967d9a8df668615458327 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:39de0bc397ff29e132d3d892338a0eb7:0.55485900 1758278477 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.