| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 R 3026/17 | 31.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 844/18 | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 R 3013/15 | 13.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 3680/17 | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 19. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 893/19 WA | 05.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 265/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 19. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 1 KA 10/15 | 18.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 3/20 R | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 19. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 SO 27/19 | 01.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 19. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 AY 61/18 | 07.11.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 AY 38/18 | 28.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 56 SF 11/16 E | 15.03.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 15/17 E | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 16 KA 8/17 | 20.04.2018 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 20/18 R | 12.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 40 AS 6296/15 | 27.03.2019 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 1/20 R | 19.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 48 KR 2308/13 | 14.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 19/16 | 03.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 22/18 R | 19.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 32 AY 47/19 ER | 26.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AY 27/20 B ER und L 20 AY 28/20 B | 02.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 VG 60/13 | 18.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 12/20 | 04.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 26/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 BA 444/18 | 17.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 197/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 18 U 455/16 | 19.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 630/18 | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 30 BA 210/18 | 10.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 153/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 19/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 19 AY 39/19 | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AY 7/20 B ER | 22.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 R 454/12 | 12.03.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 369/13 | 14.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 67/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 R 454/12 | 12.03.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 369/13 | 14.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 67/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KA 51/14 | 16.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 78/17 | 18.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 18 U 317/17 | 09.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 488/19 | 02.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 23 AS 295/05 | 30.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 9 KR 1409/19 | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 300/20 | 08.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 KR 260/99 | 24.11.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 B 79/99 KR | 24.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 10 U 306/00 | 23.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 6 KN 184/99 | 14.03.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 18. Juni 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 403 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 403 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 403 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 844/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-844-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-844-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 3680/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-3680-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-3680-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 166 KR 893/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-166-kr-893-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-166-kr-893-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KA 10/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ka-10-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ka-10-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 SO 27/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-so-27-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-so-27-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AY 38/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-ay-38-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-ay-38-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 15/17 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-15-17-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-15-17-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 20/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-20-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:00:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:00:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-20-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:00:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:00:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87426 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 22/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-22-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:00:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:00:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-22-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AY 27/20 B ER und L 20 AY 28/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-ay-27-20-b-er-und-l-20-ay-28-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-ay-27-20-b-er-und-l-20-ay-28-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 12/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-12-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-12-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 197/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-197-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-197-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 630/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-630-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-630-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 153/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-153-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-153-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AY 7/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-ay-7-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:04:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:04:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-ay-7-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 369/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-369-13-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-369-13-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 369/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-369-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-369-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 78/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-78-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-78-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 145219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 488/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-488-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:03:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:03:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-488-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 295/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-295-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-295-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 1409/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-1409-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-1409-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134665 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 260/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-260-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-260-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 306/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-306-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-306-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133751 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KN 184/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kn-184-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kn-184-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 844/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-844-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-844-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b0dd967d20c19d84465b3db864e75b1d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5794f672b29423348c679aa8a851ab0e:0.87641800 1758289685 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.