| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 956/13 | 12.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 EG 12/14 | 21.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 24 SB 335/17 | 08.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 17 KR 146/13 | 16.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 14 AS 1909/17 | 10.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 33 U 162/13 | 01.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 18. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KR 1848/18 ER | 26.09.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 584/19 B ER | 27.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 19 KR 279/20 ER | 19.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 150/20 B ER | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 44 R 1898/12 | 03.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 195/15 | 17.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 13 SF 1259/20 AB (S 12 SB 3599/19) | 10.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 17. Juni 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 24 R 48/19 | 14.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 122/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 1051/17 | 29.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 75/18 | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 2811/15 | 13.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 32/18 | 29.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 159/13 | 28.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 374/17 | 11.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 159/13 | 28.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 374/17 | 11.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 392/18 | 23.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 362/19 | 25.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 BA 16/20 ER | 23.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 36/20 B ER | 25.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 407/20 ER | 30.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 184/20 B ER | 19.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 152/20 KL ER | 28.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 157 AS 2335/20 ER | 08.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 602/20 B ER | 04.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 157 AS 2335/20 ER | 08.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 602/20 B ER | 04.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 U 3403/18 | 30.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 4109/19 | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 14 U 2417/17 | 18.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 3509/19 | 24.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 U 972/18 | 19.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 4406/18 | 24.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Juni 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SB 2205/17 | 29.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 2115/19 | 20.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Juni 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 404 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 404 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 404 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132821 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 956/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-956-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-956-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 EG 12/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-eg-12-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-eg-12-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 SB 335/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-sb-335-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-sb-335-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 146/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-146-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-146-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AS 1909/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-as-1909-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-as-1909-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 U 162/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-u-162-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-u-162-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 584/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-584-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-584-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 150/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-150-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-150-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 R 1898/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-r-1898-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-r-1898-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 SF 1259/20 AB (S 12 SB 3599/19) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-sf-1259-20-ab-s-12-sb-3599-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-sf-1259-20-ab-s-12-sb-3599-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 R 48/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-r-48-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-r-48-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 75/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-75-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-75-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 32/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-32-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-32-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 374/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-374-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-374-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 374/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-374-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:22:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:22:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-374-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 362/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-362-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-362-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 36/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-36-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-36-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 184/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-184-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-184-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 152/20 KL ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-152-20-kl-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-152-20-kl-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 602/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-602-20-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-602-20-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126462 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 602/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-602-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-602-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 4109/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-4109-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-4109-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 3509/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-3509-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-3509-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 4406/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-4406-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-4406-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 2115/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-2115-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:07:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:07:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-2115-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132821 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-06-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-06-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 956/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-956-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-956-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 87621cd79c74cc8422d169e93aff3cbf [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:315117be3d8e69af18fa9eaef66a7906:0.01544900 1758313361 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.