| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 U 220/21 | 30.12.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 81/22 | 16.05.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 87/24 ER | 26.03.2024 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 116/24 B ER | 19.06.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 BA 132/22 | 09.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 BA 92/23 B | 07.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 708/18 | 26.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 425/20 | 06.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 3 KR 626/17 | 25.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 167/21 | 19.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 18/23 KL | 24.04.2024 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 43 KR 9/15 | 24.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 6/21 | 13.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 32 SB 183/19 | 22.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 91/22 | 29.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 22 KA 10/19 | 26.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 4/22 | 24.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| S 76 BA 450/18 | 10.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 78/20 | 23.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 357/23 ER | 15.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 75/24 B ER | 08.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 34 AS 3828/16 | 16.06.2023 | L 5 AS 249/23 | 05.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 R 131/21 | 24.10.2022 | L 3 R 319/22 | 30.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 5 AS 824/17 | 12.03.2021 | L 5 AS 245/21 | 24.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Juni 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 1933/20 | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2057/22 | 29.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 17 R 1821/21 | 04.04.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1319/23 | 18.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 1238/24 AB | 18.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 U 266/20 | 04.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 961/21 | 27.06.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 3412/21 | 10.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1718/23 | 13.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 46 SB 1236/22 | 29.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 230/23 | 16.05.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 26. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 872/17 | 21.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 BA 111/18 | 19.03.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 26. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 111/18 | 18.08.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 26. Juni 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 145/17 | 18.02.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 26. Juni 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 1512/18 | 08.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2037/19 | 21.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 13/21 R | 20.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 10 KR 3746/19 | 21.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1922/21 | 25.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 2/22 R | 20.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Juni 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 41 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 41 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 41 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 81/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-81-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-81-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 116/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-116-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-116-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 92/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-92-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-92-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 425/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-425-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-425-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 167/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-167-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-167-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129574 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 18/23 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-18-23-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-18-23-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129568 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 6/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-6-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-6-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129565 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 91/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-91-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-91-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 4/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-4-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-4-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129560 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 78/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-78-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-78-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 75/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-75-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-75-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 249/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-249-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-249-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 319/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-319-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-319-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 245/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-245-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-245-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160615 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2057/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2057-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2057-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1319/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1319-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1319-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160609 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 1238/24 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-1238-24-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-1238-24-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160606 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 961/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-961-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-961-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160603 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1718/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1718-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:24:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:24:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1718-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150362 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 230/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-230-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-230-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 BA 111/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-ba-111-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-ba-111-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 U 111/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-u-111-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-u-111-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144986 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 U 145/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-u-145-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-u-145-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 13/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-13-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:20:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:20:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-13-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 2/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-2-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:20:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:20:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-2-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 81/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-81-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-81-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 19845d0361c7bd813de651274d523aa4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:576353501a10e44206a267c5b0e6cd75:0.39551300 1745217417 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.