| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 R 1033/14 | 04.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 74/18 | 04.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 175/14 | 19.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 25/17 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 57 KR 2195/15 | 28.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 17/19 | 20.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 KR 872/15 | 25.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 95/18 | 24.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 34 R 698/15 | 02.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 R 20/19 | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 8 KR 2233/16 | 25.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 87/19 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 35 AS 703/16 | 21.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 164/19 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 41/17 | 09.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 30/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 42/11 | 04.12.2013 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 5/17 ZVW | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 P 112/15 | 06.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 P 19/16 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 P 5/16 | 25.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 P 17/16 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 35 EG 26/17 | 25.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 EG 4/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 58 AS 3959/18 | 16.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 120/19 | 17.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 61/18 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 15/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 17 AS 408/18 | 30.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 269/18 | 17.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 59 VG 33/09 | 03.12.2013 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 VE 1/14 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 38 AS 1810/15 | 04.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 186/18 | 16.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 EG 3339/18 | 07.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 2314/19 | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KR 2474/18 | 11.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3794/19 | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 KR 1689/18 | 18.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2478/19 | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 KR 3578/17 | 30.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 162/19 | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 14 KR 997/17 | 16.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2908/19 | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 230/17 | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 29. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 120 AL 207/18 | 21.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 28. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SB 3599/19 | 26.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 28. Mai 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 410 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 410 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 410 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 74/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-74-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-74-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158985 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 25/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-25-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-25-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 17/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-17-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-17-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 95/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-95-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-95-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 20/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-20-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-20-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 87/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-87-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-87-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 164/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-164-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-164-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158959 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 30/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-30-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-30-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 5/17 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-5-17-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-5-17-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158951 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 P 19/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-p-19-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-p-19-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 P 17/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-p-17-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-p-17-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 4/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-4-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-4-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158938 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 120/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-120-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-120-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 15/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-15-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-15-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 269/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-269-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-269-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 VE 1/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ve-1-14-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ve-1-14-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158922 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 186/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-186-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-186-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 EG 2314/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-eg-2314-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-eg-2314-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3794/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3794-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3794-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2478/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2478-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2478-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 162/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-162-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-162-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 2908/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-2908-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-2908-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 U 230/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-u-230-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-u-230-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 120 AL 207/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-120-al-207-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-120-al-207-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 3599/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-3599-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-3599-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 74/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-74-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:02:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:02:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-74-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0900df34959137d5bf7d242732323745 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e6b7222aaf7a95a18db46271770d1c57:0.73517600 1758319618 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.