| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 955/19 | 20.05.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 28. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 P 99/16 | 02.06.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 P 35/17 | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 15/19 B | 14.04.2020 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 28. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 R 84/17 | 28.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 27/18 | 06.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 28. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 P 99/16 | 02.06.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 P 35/17 | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 15/19 B | 14.04.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 179 AS 3426/20 ER | 20.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 27. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 31/04 ER | 17.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 B 31/04 KR ER | 19.05.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 13 (19) V 51/92 | 19.11.1997 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 V 6/98 | 16.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 22 KR 525/15 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 109/17 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 6 AS 2116/19 | 03.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 664/19 B | 01.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 4 AL 204/14 | 29.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 19/19 | 30.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 4 AS 1168/16 | 10.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 342/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 28 AS 5123/14 | 29.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 607/18 NZB | 24.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 32 AS 1416/16 | 04.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 385/17 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 P 9/17 KL | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 U 175/14 | 24.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 121/15 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 AS 1196/16 | 16.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 52/17 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 713/16 | 26.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 BA 76/18 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 29 SO 24/15 | 13.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 7/18 | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 76/19 B | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 25 AY 29/16 | 10.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 AY 1/17 | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 3840/12 | 09.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 832/15 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 39/20 B | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 3840/12 | 09.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 832/15 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 39/20 B | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 21 KR 13/17 | 22.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 12/18 | 20.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 3/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 4 AS 9/13 | 15.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 517/15 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 17 KR 146/13 | 26.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 18/17 | 16.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 88/18 B | 12.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 19 AY 37/19 ER | 16.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 26. Mai 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 411 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 411 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 411 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 955/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-955-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-955-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 P 99/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-p-99-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-p-99-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 84/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-84-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-84-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130039 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 P 35/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-p-35-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-p-35-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 179 AS 3426/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-179-as-3426-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-179-as-3426-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140244 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 31/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-31-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-31-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 (19) V 51/92 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-19-v-51-92 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-19-v-51-92/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 109/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-109-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-109-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 664/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-664-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-664-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 19/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-19-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-19-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 342/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-342-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-342-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 607/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-607-18-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-607-18-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161492 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 385/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-385-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-385-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161488 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 9/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-9-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-9-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161486 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 121/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-121-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-121-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161485 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 52/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-52-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-52-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161480 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BA 76/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ba-76-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ba-76-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161476 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 7/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-7-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-7-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 1/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-1-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-1-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161382 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 832/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-832-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-832-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 832/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-832-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-832-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 12/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-12-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:37:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:37:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-12-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 517/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-517-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-517-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 18/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-18-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-18-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AY 37/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ay-37-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ay-37-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 955/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-955-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-955-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 2d9b39e0a6f8eeef6d91a35b71f9c371 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:69158ef5da4a09ba6cb899d1ddc65033:0.33223000 1758319662 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.